5 Doomed Romance Leonardo DiCaprio Movi ...
Wes Anderson's 5 Best Commercials
Can 'World War Z' Break Even?
Steve Soderbergh On Cinema, Studios, Mor ...
Recap: 'The King Of Comedy' 30th Anniversary ...
Excl: Lake Bell Joins 'Million Dollar Ar ...
10 Essential Cinematic AntiheroesSpeaking with THR (via IGN) Neal Moritz says the actual cost of the first movie cut into the potential profits, essentially killing the opportunity of a sequel. "The movie did almost $250 million and was actually very well liked, but we made the movie for too much money. One, we made it in L.A. for certain reasons, and two, we decided to go to 3D -- that added another $10 million. If I had done it in a tax-rebate state and not done 3D, it would have been considered a huge financial success for the studio. So we're not making a sequel right now," he said.
It's kind of ironic that 3D conversion -- done to boost box office and lure audiences -- is one of the very factors that kept "The Green Hornet" from being profitable enough to make a sequel viable. We hope that Hollywood will learn its lesson, but they likely won't. Overall, we can't say we're really that surprised, but fans shouldn't be too disappointed. Once enough time has passed, the property will probably be dusted off and rebooted all over again. After all, Sony is bringing "The Amazing Spider-Man" to screens only five years after "Spider-Man 3" so they know how they game is played. But Seth Rogen once again suiting up? Probably not gonna happen.
2 Comments
Luca | March 13, 2012 5:06 PM
I didn't even get through the first one I wouldn't waste money on seeing a sequel. I saw it on HBO and it was boring, bland, etc. christoph waltz is too talented to even have put his foot in that garbage.
Armando | March 13, 2012 12:14 PM
I thought it was a given there would be no sequel for the 1st time.. since it's one of the most moronic superhero flicks ever made. One of those movies that was conceived while high.. and it totally shows.