Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

Oscars: What Films Are Looking Good Coming Out Of Venice, Telluride & TIFF?

by Oliver Lyttelton
September 12, 2013 4:36 PM
  • |

With Venice and Telluride in the rear-view mirror, and TIFF starting to wind down (we've still got coverage to come, but very few films remain that haven't been screened for press), it feels like the perfect time to kick off, for real, our annual awards coverage. There's a part of you that groans, and that's fair enough—it does feel like only yesterday that we were talking "Argo" vs. "Life of Pi" and so on, but even with five months to go until the ceremony itself, over half of the films that'll be in play have been unveiled. And you can bet your bottom dollar that Oscar campaigns have been underway for weeks, if not months.

There's lots more to come into view, both in the near future (NYFF is only a few weeks away), and further away (some films are unlikely to be unveiled until the end of November at the earliest), but taking the temperature of the race so far, where do we stand? Well, it's looking, even by the tough standard of last year, like it's going to be a particularly competitive race. Variety semi-jokingly (we hope...) suggested yesterday that the Academy should extend the Best Picture field to 20 this year, and while their logic is pretty unsound, it's clear that more than ever, there's going to be blood on the floor come the nomination announcements in January, what with heavy hitters like "The Wolf Of Wall Street," "Monuments Men" and "American Hustle" still some way off.

Best Picture and Actor are looking particularly brutal, but even Best Actress, which has had quote-unquote weaker line-ups in recent years (more a by-product of the Academy shunning deserving turns like Tilda Swinton in "We Need To Talk About Kevin" and Rachel Weisz in "The Deep Blue Sea" than a reflection of the field) is looking like it's going to be a difficult one to call. This discussion is one that will shift and change, but let's get the ball rolling. Who can take advantage of the early-bird discount on limo bookings for Oscar night, and who can make plans to be elsewhere? Thoughts on the Oscar circus as it stands below.

The Near Certainties:
Both "Gravity" and "12 Years A Slave" were looking good on paper for potential awards consideration, but both had reasons to be cautious. Was "Gravity" just going to be a pure thrill ride, or worse, some kind of "The Fountain"-like mind-bender? Would 'Slave' prove to be as inaccessible for wider audiences as director Steve McQueen's "Hunger" and "Shame"? But from the moments the films first screened, at Venice and Telluride respectively, it's been clear that both are likely to be major players all the way through February. "Gravity" is clearly going to be this year's answer to the "Avatar"/"Hugo"/"Life Of Pi" slot—a 3D technical extravaganza that could well clear up in the tech categories, and it's got a good shot at finally landing DP Emmanuel Lubezki his first statue. It could also pick up acting nominations, with Sandra Bullock a good bet, and George Clooney certainly a possibility too. The inevitable semi-backlash arrived with some cooler notices at TIFF after universally ecstatic reception in Venice and Telluride, and one wonders if "The Secret Life Of Walter Mitty"—which at least from this distance seems more in the emotional vein of "Life Of Pi" than "Gravity" and has it's own share of effects—could throw a spoke in the wheels. 

Meanwhile, "12 Years A Slave" was, if anything, even better received, with ecstatic, bruised reactions almost universal, and some even declaring the Oscar race over at the start of September. Obviously, we're not silly enough to make such proclamations, but it's impossible to see a scenario in which this isn't a Best Picture nominee. Chiwetel Ejiofor, seems a certainty too, even with the toughest category in recent memory, and there's a strong chance that co-stars Lupita Nyong'o and Michael Fassbender will follow him (we wonder if the unrelentingly evil nature of Fassbender's performance might end up counting against him, but it'll depend on the strength of the competition, which is unclear at this stage). There'll inevitably be nay-sayers, and the film's likely going to be a target for dirty-tricks-fuelled op-eds, given its subject matter, but McQueen seems to have made something accessible enough to bring in Academy voters, that's still likely to have heavy critical support—it's a potential winner at Critics Circle awards, which will help keep momentum up through the end of the year.

Joining the two as a pretty solid Best Picture contender is "Inside Llewyn Davis," which had its first stateside screening at Telluride. Again, it's hard to find someone who doesn't like the film, while it's perhaps not as mortal a lock as "Gravity" and "12 Years A Slave," if only because distributor CBS Films are untested as awards campaigners. But this still feels like a very, very solid proposition, and the Coen brothers are longtime Academy favorites.

Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    


  • Child of God | September 29, 2013 11:55 PMReply

    Scott Haze 4 Child of God with nomination 4 James Franco as Director.

    Also, hope the Oscars don't forget Franco's performance 4 Spring Breakers as in Best Supporting Actor.

  • Bill G | September 14, 2013 3:51 PMReply

    How about Brie Larson in "Short Term 12", and the film in general? Is it lacking in star power? Is Cinedigm too small to give it an Oscar push? It's definitely the best film I've seen all year, though I admit that I haven't seen most of the heavy hitters yet.

  • CrombyMouse | September 13, 2013 3:19 AMReply

    And what about Ain't Them Body Saints?

  • catherin | September 13, 2013 3:11 AMReply

    I expected to see some improvements in my love life after I contacted Ekaka and asked him to send out a spell to the Universe for me, but I didn’t expect a life-changing experience, that’s for sure! Still, though, that’s what I got! I’m not only in love, I’m going to be moving to my soon-to-be-fiance’s state next month! We probably would never even have met if it weren’t for ekakaspelltemple@ yahoocom and his wonderful powers of peace and love. I wish you all the peace and love you sent me, DR Ekaka.

  • cirkusfolk | September 12, 2013 8:13 PMReply

    I saw the trailer for Prisoners and was immediately struck by how gorgeous it looked. So I looked up who shot it, and of course it was none other than Roger Deakins. I'll expect another nom for him this year, but not the win :(

  • Mohammed | September 12, 2013 5:47 PMReply

    If there is one film I like to see excluded it's August: Osage County. It looks terrible, has had mixed to bad reviews, and it's director is telling the press that the ending wasn't made by him or for creative choice, but 1) because test-audiences liked the current one, and 2) because Harvey demanded it. Send a message that the creative choice should be the directors and shut out August entirely.

    Also shut out American Hustle. Russel's Silver was a sh** movie that somehow went all the way entirely on the basis of Harvey. And anyone who thinks Jennifer Lawrence delivered a better performance than Riva is crazy.

  • Oh Dear | September 12, 2013 8:37 PM

    Silver Linings Playbook is pure brilliance. Riva and Lawrence were equally great.

  • Tyler | September 12, 2013 6:21 PM

    American Hustle has alot of things going for it and will certainly not be shut out. It will most likely be up for Best Picture. But you must have been watching a completely different movie than the rest of the world if you though Silver Linings sucked

  • cass | September 12, 2013 5:41 PMReply

    what are you talking about when you say the evil nature of his character will go against Fassbender? Hello Bardem in No Country, Waltz in Basterds, Ledger in Dark Knight. Tucci, Renner and Brolin were nominated; this category LOVES evil guys.

  • Daniel O'Raw | September 13, 2013 3:54 PM

    The mere thought that the evil nature of a character could stop someone winning for a great performance is ridiculous. If the Oscars think like that, then they truly are retarded, but I guess they are considering Ralph Fiennes Nazi performance not winning and them giving it to bloody Tommy Lee Jones' silly cop chasing Harrison Ford in the Fugitive.

  • Fred | September 13, 2013 12:06 PM

    I would say that at the time, Bardem was not fun evil. Perhaps taken as the kickoff of his colorful, crazy-haired villain string and of a piece with them, but the strange do still didn't make his killer much fun. Ditto Waltz: witty banter doesn't negate the horrific deeds of a Nazi or a sociopathic killing machine.

  • Oliver Lyttelton | September 12, 2013 7:02 PM

    But there's fun evil -- Bardem, Waltz, Ledger -- and brutal, irredeemable, inhuman evil. I feel like Fassbender's more in the latter category in Slave, and that's less popular when it comes to that category. Then again, Ralph Fiennes was nominated for Schindler's List, so it wouldn't be unprecedented.

  • joe | September 12, 2013 5:34 PMReply

    you will first hear it in this commnet:

    altough james gandolfini has a bigger role in enough said he absolutelly kills it in animal rescue

    his performance is hands down the second best in his carrer (number one will always be tony ) but the best in his film career and you'll hear his name among the supporting actor nominees in 2015 at the oscars

  • BOO | September 12, 2013 5:32 PMReply

    Fruitvale Station I think is still a contender for a Picture nomination. It's kind of like Beasts of the Southern Wild and the Academy gave that a lot.

  • Tyler | September 12, 2013 6:17 PM

    If Fruitvale Station gets anything I think it will only be a nod for Michael B. Jordan. And with so many potentials for best actor I believe he will be pushed out of the running. The same way Shailene Woodley was two years ago.

Email Updates