Review: 'Alps' Another Unique & Remarkable Film From Director Yorgos Lanthimos

Reviews

by Oliver Lyttelton
July 10, 2012 4:56 PM
6 Comments

The following is a reprint of our review from the Venice Film Festival.

Until a couple of years ago, few outside his native Greece were aware of theater director-turned-filmmaker Yorgos Lanthimos. But when his third film, "Dogtooth," came from seemingly nowhere to win the top prize at Un Certain Regard at Cannes in 2009, it kicked off a process that's deservedly seen the helmer become one of the most closely-watched international filmmakers around. Other than a producing and acting role in the rather-less-good "Attenberg," he's been quietly working away on a follow-up, the pitch-black "Alps," which screened for the press here in Venice tonight. And the good news is, it's just as remarkable as his breakthrough.

We're going to say this only once. We recommend you go in to "Alps" as cold as possible. It's not quite like anything you've seen (its closest relative being, well, "Dogtooth"), and part of its pleasure is watching it play out. There's no giant twist or anything, but we're glad we saw it the way we did: knowing only a brief synopsis, and nothing else. Having said that, we do have a review to write. But proceed with caution after the jump, as it were.

That brief synopsis, from the press kit, for the uninitiated: "A nurse, a paramedic, a gymnast and her coach have formed a service for hire. They stand in for dead people by appointment, hired by the relatives, friends or colleagues of the deceased. The company is called Alps. The leader, the paramedic, calls himself Mont Blanc. Although Alps members operate under a discipline regime demanded by their leader, the nurse does not." There we go. There's your premise. We'll try to stay within it, but no promises.

It's not quite the ensemble piece that it might sound like, the focus landing principally on the nurse (Aggeliki Papoulia, the only cast member to recur from "Dogtooth"). As the group's newest member, and its most independent, the majority of scenes are spent with her, while the leader Mont Blanc by necessity remains an enigma. The gymnast ("Attenberg" star Ariane Labed, who's superb here) and coach (Johnny Vekris) have a fruitful, fascinating relationship, with major scenes bookending the film, but they're generally in support to Papoulia, whose part has similar DNA to her role of the older daughter in the earlier film, while also proving distinct.

Indeed, the film is in many ways a piece with its predecessor. They share a similar approach, a similar frank, uncomfortable sexuality, a similar matter-of-fact violence. There are certain thematic concerns in common too, although we'll leave you to figure those out for yourself. It's probably a more accessible film than its predecessor, accessible being a very relative term here. It plays up the jet-black comedy, while retaining the humanism -- as strange a world as Lanthimos creates, he genuinely cares for his characters, even as they do incomprehensible things.

"Alps" is, principally, a film about grief, about how you deal with a parent, or a spouse, or a child, or a friend, who's suddenly no longer around. It's also, to some extent, about acting and actors -- the nurse is almost always playing a role, becoming something of a blank slate when she's not. Not that the members of Alps are chameleons; the blank readings they give when inhabiting the deceased gives the scenes a deeply unnerving quality.

Some may find the structure repetitive, scenes of the group together, and of the nurse at home with her aging father, interspersed with vignettes of the Alps at their work. But no two of these scenes are the same, each one introducing some new element, and peeling back a little more of the truth, while Lanthimos expertly plays with expectation, sometimes leaving you guessing when they're "in character," and when they're acting of their own volition. Some of the clients use them to relive memories, some of them to rewrite history, but the filmmaker is careful never to condemn the Alps: everyone they approach are game, and may even be helped by the group. It's worth noting, however, that anyone who insists on definitive answers will be disappointed; this is a film to argue about with friends in the lobby until the theater staff throw you out.

Lanthimos continues to prove himself a supremely controlled, disciplined filmmaker: his use of focus alone could form the basis of a film school class, and it's always interesting to note what he doesn't show, frequently cutting off or obscuring faces and relying on body language. "Alps" has proven Lanthimos to be one of the most fascinating filmmakers anywhere right now, and, while there's no immediate news on when it'll hit on the U.S., or anywhere outside Greece, we're confident it'll be one of the most talked-about films of the next year: with so much to talk about, how could it not be? [A]

Reviews

More: Alps, Review

6 Comments

| Reply
JoD | July 19, 2012 3:26 PMReply

I am not sure if the person who wrote with such enthusiasm about this film has actually seen "Alps" ("Alpis" in the original). Let me start by saying that the photographs in your article look so much better than any scene in this movie - that I found just ... awful. It is ugly in it's framing, lighting and just about everything. Is it a weird fairytale or some sort of sci-fi dream or just a freaky idea but an author - I couldn't figure it out. I was just repelled by the careless shots, the ugly colors, the dumb plot and the unwatchable actors. There is a trend in artsy European Indie-movies (well, aren't all "Indie", since we don't have studio-productions here?!) to make films that look like they were shot in two days at most, and that nobody gave a damn about color-correction, focus or stable camera-handling. Did I mention that the story isn't weird enough to be cool but too weird to be watchable. I am Austrian, and I love small-kind movies. This one I just hated. NO comparison with Dogtooth! That was a bad-ass weirdo kind of idea. But "Alps" ... brr, I wish I could get it out of my head. It was an insult. Maybe Americans like it because it was so "different". No kidding. But you guys have so many great movies, don't bother trying to praise some piece of unnecessary time-wasting like this one. (Compared to this, our very own Austrian "Michael" was well-done, but that was useless, too. Just jumping on a train with a lot of long shots and the intention of playing with a horrible trend.) Did I mention that "Alps" is completely implausible and dumb? Okay, sorry, I shut up now. If you don't have a lot of money, really spend it on something entertaining.
ska-triumph | July 14, 2012 3:17 PMReply

Saw this last night in NYC (Cinema Village) and I totally agree with this review. Maybe because city folk are more jaded - and spoiled by access to indie films - but I was among few in the audience that giggled at the dark humor. The dialogue and reveals were so crisp - from tight spaces or frames; layered b.g. movements - that my senses were being played with.
rotch | July 10, 2012 9:48 PMReply

does anyone know who distributes this in the US or where can one see the rollout release dates? thanks in advance
rotch | July 11, 2012 10:34 AM

So I feared. This is one of those cases in which I try to download the film without hesitation, and even though it's been out on dvd in Europe for a while, I can't seem to find a copy online. Bummer. Thanks for the info though.
Kino | July 11, 2012 12:45 AM

Kino Lorber. Limited release to start. Probably wont get a lot bigger.
DG | July 10, 2012 6:32 PMReply

I didn't read this review because you talked me out of it but I want to see it and am happy to see it got an A.