Review: 'Only God Forgives'
5 Doomed Romance Leonardo DiCaprio Movi ...
Wes Anderson's 5 Best Commercials
Can 'World War Z' Break Even?
Steve Soderbergh On Cinema, Studios, Mor ...
Recap: 'The King Of Comedy' 30th Anniversary ...
Excl: Lake Bell Joins 'Million Dollar Ar ...
10 Essential Cinematic AntiheroesThe movie begins in a kind of faux grindhouse style, with a credits sequence that gleefully apes schlocky fare from the late '70s and early '80s (complete with strained synth sounds). It's very clear that we're watching a movie-within-a-movie, but it smartly provides a quick shorthand to what we're about to see – it's knowing without ever being winky, reverential without ever falling into tired pastiche. Shortly it's revealed that the movie is some scratchy VHS zombie flick being viewed by our hero, Norman Babcock (Kodi Smit-McPhee), a funny little kid who has the ability to talk to ghosts (mostly his grandmother, voiced by Elaine Stritch) but not to actual people (like his parents, played by Leslie Mann and Jeff Garlin).
While Norman loves horror movies and frequently communicates with the deceased, this is something that's beyond his pay grade, and when a nutty relative blessed (or is it cursed?) with similar extra-sensory powers (played with brio by John Goodman) comes to him with a similar warning, he becomes genuinely freaked. What if the witch does return? Will she unleash an army of the dead? And will Norman be up to the challenge and manage to avoid getting beaten up by the school bully (Christopher Mintz-Plasse)?
By the time the really freaky stuff starts to happen, involving the zombified versions of the town elders and a very upset and very witchy ghost, you're fully invested in this world. As the horror escalates, more characters join the fray, including Neil's older brother Mitch (Casey Affleck) and Norman's sister Courtney (Anna Kendrick), giving the movie a rollicking "Goonies"/"Monster Squad" feel, and while things get crazier and more otherworldly, the emotional content deepens, too. We can't talk about it without giving away some key things, but it's really surprising how emotionally resonant the movie becomes, and deeply satisfying too. (There's also an amazing joke towards the end that will certainly negate any chance of "ParaNorman" kids toys being stuck in kiddie meals at Chick-fil-A.)
Even the 3D utilized for "ParaNorman" seems like a cut above. The technology has always served stop-motion animation well, emphasizing the tactile nature of the animation through truly spectacular dimensionality. That's also the case with "ParaNorman" – "Fantastic Mr. Fox" vet Nelson Lowry's eye-popping production design and Oliver's cinematography seem that much more impressive through the wondrous 3D effects, a perfect blending of ancient animation techniques with cutting-edge technology. In most cases 3D seems worse than superfluous; it's downright detrimental. With "ParaNorman," 3D glasses should be a requirement; the effect is essential.
It's the combination of the film's visual prowess and the genuine emotional content that makes "ParaNorman" such a singularly powerful experience. It would be one thing to just watch the movie, alight at all that you're seeing. But there's something deep and truthful that elevates it to another plateau. You'll wipe away tears while you're screaming for more. It's not only the best and brightest surprise of this long and dreary summer, but it's easily one of the best movies of the year, a complex and multifaceted blast. "ParaNorman" is a micro-sized masterpiece that wears its heart (and its half-eaten brains) on its sleeve. [A]
Why 'Star Trek Into Darkness' Suggests J.J. Abrams Needs To Leave His Mystery Box Alone For A While
15 Comments
ac satya shah | January 19, 2013 1:07 AM
Check out the news of new upcoming animation movies releases in 2013-14
at âanimation carnivalââ¦..
http://www.animationcarnival.com/newsf/News.aspx?NewsSectionID=Movie%20Release
Venkman | September 24, 2012 5:40 PM
Just saw this last night and I must admit I thoroughly enjoyed myself. The whole thing is visual eye candy and I constantly found myself amazed at the level of detail and the numerous sight gags throughout. I live in the mid-west and I have to say that the gag at the end had me laughing out loud so hard I almost blew coke out my nose, but the rest of the audience in this conservative area seemed less entertained. I could almost hear the wheels spinning... "Should I say something to reinforce our superstitious, ancient, and dearly held beliefs to my kid to negate those 2 seconds of horrible, modern societal influence or is it best left alone?" Personally, I thought it was awesome... Definitely one I'll pick up on blu-ray when it comes out.
Blogger | September 18, 2012 2:54 PM
Hey nice article, Hey check out my list of "top animation movie list" at
http://tad.co.in/?p=283
Sveta Piatakova | August 27, 2012 8:21 AM
Great review! It was a fun movie with a twist on the whole zombie thing but I do think it is for a certain audience. I would not recommend it for kids who are easily scared. My girl is 5 now and she is in that 'scary' phase. She had no problem watching 'Coraline' when she was 3 but now it totally freaks her out and she even asked me turn it off (a first one for her). It's a shame cuz the movie is a good metaphor for bullying. And I don't think it's extreme to compare it to witch hunts; bullying is very dangerous, and the effects of it are only studied now, so we are only about to find out exactly HOW dangerous it is.
Chris Jollay | August 16, 2012 11:09 PM
I thought the end joke was funny, but I also thought is was weirdly out of place in what was supposed to be kind of a children's movie. I also thought the bullying analogy to the Salem Witch Trials was a little much considering that as well.
Above average but by no means one of the best movies of the year.
martin | August 14, 2012 9:37 PM
Are they giving paranorman in chicken fil A in Mcallen tx
Kevin | August 7, 2012 1:17 PM
Counterpoint: This movie is tedious as hell.
Sveta Piatakova | August 7, 2012 12:59 PM
Great review - something positive in the critical circles finally. Is it OK for a five-year-old? I am having huge doubts cuz my daughter was somewhat disturbed by the trailer... And she was watching 'Coraline' the other day and asked me to turn it off, even though she loved it at 3 and 4... I guess, she is more aware now. Personally, I cannot wait to see the new flick!
Lucy | August 5, 2012 7:20 PM
Great to hear because I loved Coraline, one of my favorite films and I now can't wait to see this!!!
Jeff | August 4, 2012 9:07 PM
Sounds great! It's worth pointing out though that while Tristan Oliver may be a "genius," he also has a history of being incredibly unprofessional.
http://articles.latimes.com/2009/oct/11/entertainment/ca-mrfox11
Taylor | August 4, 2012 4:42 PM
Nice. With the glut of remakes/reboots and sequels this summer, and sitting through the ones that brought absolutely nothing to the table and were nothing but soulless studio garbage (how I loathe you, Amazing Spider-Man) - and being a big animation buff - this was the movie I was most looking forward to. Glad to hear good things.
oogle monster | August 4, 2012 3:57 PM
All the awards!!!