Review: 'Only God Forgives'
5 Doomed Romance Leonardo DiCaprio Movi ...
Wes Anderson's 5 Best Commercials
Can 'World War Z' Break Even?
Steve Soderbergh On Cinema, Studios, Mor ...
Recap: 'The King Of Comedy' 30th Anniversary ...
Excl: Lake Bell Joins 'Million Dollar Ar ...
10 Essential Cinematic AntiheroesIn fact, we never really know who Geraci is. A trained chef, it's not really clear how he came into food activism, why he lives on a houseboat, why he chose Baltimore to try and reform, or even what his own investment is in seeing this program through. Regardless, the focus on "Cafeteria Man" is witnessing the development of his vision, not necessarily the man himself, and what he proposes is certainly compelling. He argues that if local, fresher, tastier food product is available and cheaper than the meals provided by contractors, there is no reason why kids can't have healthy lunches. But his plans don't end there, with community "teaching" gardens grown by kids, afterschool dinner programs, greenhouses and more that are all part of a sustainable, citizen-and-student-driven food program. Sounds cool, right?
Geraci abruptly leaves his position at the end of the film, taking on a part-time consulting role instead, seemingly leaving in triumph. But did he? A cursory internet search brings up more than one article that suggests a more complex story than the one fed in "Cafeteria Man" (this piece at Urbanite, for example). Not everyone saw Geraci following through on his promises, while others contend he spoke a good game and didn't deliver, while the city of Baltimore itself may be to blame for not getting behind the man as much as they could. Chisolm isn't interested in exploring these criticisms and the film suffers as a result, essentially coming off as a one-hour cheerleading session for Geraci.
"Cafeteria Man" is now airing on the Documentary Channel.
Why 'Star Trek Into Darkness' Suggests J.J. Abrams Needs To Leave His Mystery Box Alone For A While
5 Comments
Dana Woldow | October 30, 2012 12:34 PM
I saw "Cafeteria Man" in San Francisco; you can read my review here:
Cafeteria Man Tony Geraci: hype or hope?
http://tinyurl.com/dx4994u
I've been actively involved with school food reform in SF since 2002, and I can assure you that Geraci and this film had no impact whatsoever on our work here. It is more than a little troubling that the distributor of this puff piece would try to claim the credit for inspiring efforts which have already been moving forward for a decade.
Steve Ladd | October 25, 2012 1:24 AM
As the distributor of this film, I have to say your review runs counter to the reception and impact we've seen Cafeteria Man have at a variety of screenings -- from Atlanta to Dallas, San Francisco to Washington, DC, and more. It inspires people with a vision of what's possible and encourages them to take action to improve school food programs in their communities. It doesn't gloss over the difficulties -- you certainly see Tony's frustrations with the challenges he faces. Tony has had even greater success in Memphis, a bigger district which has a central kitchen. For more info on what he has accomplished since leaving Baltimore, and other resources that help fill out this film, visit http://www.cafeteriaman.com
Richard Chisolm | October 24, 2012 5:40 PM
As the director of Cafeteria Man, I was not contacted or interviewed for this review. That is unfortunate since the reviewer made spurious assumptions of what the film intended to be and used information from a magazine article that was rife with errors. We did not portray Tony Geraci as a saint, nor was the film a 'portrait' documentary about his life. The film was deliberately a glimpse of aspirations to reform school food in Baltimore against formidable obstacles and a shameful history of systemic decline. And Mr. Geraci neither left Baltimore "abruptly" in our film nor in real life. The fact that our independent documentary has screened at over twenty festivals, received awards at three, and been highly successful in advancing a national conversation on its subject seems not to figure into this reviewer's critique of the film he would like to have seen.