Review: 'Only God Forgives'
5 Doomed Romance Leonardo DiCaprio Movi ...
Wes Anderson's 5 Best Commercials
Can 'World War Z' Break Even?
Steve Soderbergh On Cinema, Studios, Mor ...
Recap: 'The King Of Comedy' 30th Anniversary ...
Excl: Lake Bell Joins 'Million Dollar Ar ...
10 Essential Cinematic AntiheroesIn the opening seconds of the first episode (or "Chapter 1"), our main character, the congressional Majority Whip Francis Underwood (Kevin Spacey), walks out of his Georgetown brownstone, leans down to investigate a neighbor's dog that had just been struck by a car and calmly, while delivering a monologue into the camera about suffering, kills the dog. Such perversity is second nature to Fincher, who directed the first two episodes and who once developed an entry of the bubbly "Mission: Impossible" franchise around black market organ harvesting, but it's still a bold way to open up a series. Especially since this is the character we're supposed to be following for thirteen episodes.
As "Chapter 1" develops, the various cogs in Underwood's machine snap into focus as a series of interlocking subplots, most notably the involvement of Zoe Barns (Kate Mara), a struggling, peppy young reporter who is having trouble being taken seriously at her paper, the fictional Washington Herald. An early sequence where she fights with her superior about the changing face of media might as well be directed at the audience, given its hefty metaphoric implications for "House of Cards," a TV show that is debuting for many on silvery computer screens. After attending an inaugural party where Underwood is photographed oogling her in a white dress that seems less worn than spray-painted on, she makes an uneasy alliance with the Congressman. He agrees to ply her with crucial scoops, which compromise her morally but could be responsible for a meteoric career boost. She agrees to the deal and quickly leaks a proposed education bill that Underwood knows is too left-of-center for the young administration.
"Chapter 1" brilliantly sets up the kind of backstabbing and betrayal that will undoubtedly continue to flow. This makes it sound like a more sophisticated version of "Scandal," but it most certainly is not (it's so much more). As written by "Ides of March" scribe Beau Williamson and directed by Fincher, "Chapter 1" pops. Fincher is at the top of his game, as always, utilizing digital photography in a way that he has developed over the last few movies, with a wintery color palette and camera movements so glacially smooth that it's like the camera was being slid over a snow-dusted frozen pond. Nothing is ever particularly showy, but you know you're in the hands of a master stylist.
"Chapter 2," is less beholden to the set-up, and portions of Underwood's scheme start to actually get done (what these things are, we're hesitant to reveal). Fincher, too, is able to luxuriate in this world, occasionally eschewing the dense political discussion for creating equally powerful sequences of domestic life between Claire and Frank. It's these moments that seem genuinely refreshing – it would be the first thing a TV executive or ad guy would say needed to be cut. "Why the fuck are they talking about a rowing machine? Lose it. Unless we could get product placement…" would probably be the note. But these are the scenes that help enrich and elevate "House of Cards."
There is an element of dangerous unpredictability to "House of Cards," possibly aided by its nontraditional format, that is truly refreshing. It might be reminiscent of a number of genre tropes, and formally isn't all that different from the kind of material you could find on premium cable, but it has an energy and wit all its own. It seems and looks and feels genuinely different, and wholly brilliant. It will be interesting to see, as the series passes off to different directors, if this kind of toothsome energy can continue. Since all of the episodes are available now, we'll know soon enough, but we just hope this "House of Cards" doesn't come tumbling down as we continue to dive in. [First two episodes: A]
All thirteen episodes of "House Of Cards" Season One are now available on Netflix.
Why 'Star Trek Into Darkness' Suggests J.J. Abrams Needs To Leave His Mystery Box Alone For A While
4 Comments
Rose | February 5, 2013 7:22 PM
I love this show! I was involved in politics for many years, I can clearly see composites of candidates and representatives I have known through the years. My own representitave, young, promising, and from Pennsylvania! When his party knew he was a drunk, and the local police were sick of protecting him the party helped him out by hiring a driver to deliver him to and from the state house, he could no longer hide his behavior from his constituents when he started beating his wife! This show rocks, anyone who says this is complete fantasy , must be a politician !
Ian Peterson | February 2, 2013 2:01 AM
Hmmm...
While I was very excited about this one - as I would be about any Fincher project - I must say I am a bit disappointed. It certainly looks and feels like carefully crafted piece, but overall, it's tone and narrative seems a bit over the top. It almost feels like a parody at times - reminding of much more original Armando Iannucci work or even better moments of "The Office". If this is satire, it lacks the humor - and if it's a political thriller it lacks realism. Something that "Ides of March" hit pitch perfect, here it seems a bit tone deaf.
I will keep watching hoping things will get better but, sorry to say, right now, it does not look like a possibility. Kevin Spacey is always a pleasure to watch, but in "Margin Call" and "Casino Jack" he managed to do a much better job - just by the virtue of having better material to work with.
InstaFlicka | February 1, 2013 12:50 PM
I've watched the first five episodes. I would give it a B grade. It looks and feels great, but it is very stilted. It doesn't explode off the screen. Compared to a show like "Boss" or "Homeland" this show is relatively boring. That's not to say I don't like it, however.
Eneko Ruiz | February 1, 2013 12:35 PM
"You might very well think that; I couldn't possibly comment"