Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

Review: The Outrageously Terrible 'The Human Race' Is A Bad Movie Drinking Game Waiting To Happen

by Gabe Toro
June 14, 2014 10:09 AM
  • |

Ah, what would we have to give to bring back “Mystery Science Theater 3000”? They would have a field day with the completely embarrassing “The Human Race,” an inept sci-fi film that seems like a throwback to incompetent straight-to-video cheapies of the 80's, the kind of time-wasters that would employ Robert Z'Dar and maybe an Estevez.

The intro to this slab of tacky genre garbage is foggy, muddy, nearly monochrome, as the victims of the title event are forced to follow a single path to victory. Without warning, we see these strangers look to the sky, as an unseen voice transmits the rules of this “game” straight into their heads – you must get to the end of the path, or you will die. And if you're lapped twice, you are dead. Also, try not to walk onto the grass that surrounds this complex of an arbitrarily-chosen jail, school and home, because your head will explode. It's not clear what's funnier – the fact that aliens invent games with the imagination of a five year old, or that as soon as they are told not to venture onto the grass, we see a couple of curious people immediately walk into the forbidden zone, followed by a head burst.

One of these decapitations belongs to a young woman whom we meet at the beginning, first caring for her dying sister, then defeating the same genetic disease. She has a real life until abruptly being ported to this other world, so it's something of a surprise that she's the first one to die, literally ten minutes into the movie. It's also cheap storytelling and a twist for the sake of a twist, burning ten useless minutes of screentime that could have been spent explaining why these aliens have invented such a transparently idiotic game that ultimately proves nothing. The end credits features a Special Thanks given to Damon Lindelof, which explains plenty.

The job of hero falls onto the shoulders of real-life amputee Eddie McGee as war vet Eddie. The character walks on crutches during the entirety of the film, though at one point he displays his easy athleticism and physical skill during a fist-fight. The concept of giving a real-life amputee a lead role – McGee is missing his left leg – is lost in the novelty of a movie about a foot race starring an amputee. Another gimmick? Your movie is about a race and you called it “The Human Race.” You were drunk. We know. That's always how that sort of thing happens.

Even with a limited but colorful location, “The Human Race” bizarrely limits itself to indoor skulking. This allows for cheap character dynamics to play out among a colorful, international group of victims. When one man, a Muslim, responds to the bloodshed by kneeling and praying, a white woman shows her aggravation and begins berating him for being part of the problem, not the solution, a real and literal “you people” moment. As if racism in 2014 involved people falsely ascribing omnipotent superpowers on oppressed minorities.

In the film's third act, we end up spending a considerable amount of time with two deaf characters played by Trista Robinson and T. Arthur Cottam, who are apparently deaf in real life. It's a unique idea, with their dialogue conveyed by subtitles, but they have such generic things to say about their disabilities that the subplot ends up being insulting in spite of itself. McGee has the lead role, but the digression involving this two deaf couple, which segues into an attempt at guilt sex, is almost avant-guarde in its flagrant disregard for common sense and good taste. Even more upsetting is the brazen cruelty that sneaks into the picture halfway through, as a small kill cult forms within the eighty participants, gleefully working together to toss people onto that deadly grass. Have you ever wanted to see a very pregnant woman's stomach completely explode across the room? You will!

Hilariously, “The Human Race” ends with not only the skimpiest explanation as to what it all meant, but also the threat of a sequel. Not to say the core idea is empty; the possibility that aliens would want to pit us against each other in a scenario that rewards teamwork but tempts our cruelty and selfishness is a decent one. As a metaphor, economic or otherwise, it never makes any really biting observations. At one point, there is a dialogue about the innate, and hypothetical, evil of man, and you think that the movie's going to reveal there's a monster inside us all. Then a couple more heads explode, and if you were wise enough to sneak alcohol in the movie, take a big swig, and plan for the future: this is a laughably bad movie, but an amazing drinking game waiting to happen. [F]

  • |

More: Reviews, Review, The Human Race

Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    


  • Ben | August 20, 2014 10:54 PMReply

    I thought it was a good movie. I'm looking forward to a sequel. It was scifi/horror that didn't break its own rules because it didn't try to explain why.

  • Manni | June 14, 2014 7:02 PMReply

    A lot of hate from the comments but I must say... this film looks AWFUL. Just violence, pure exploitation, the plot's a mix between "Cube", "Saw", "The Hunger Games" and King's "The Long Walk". I can see it beeing a bad film, but I probably won't ever confirm if that's true, because after the trailer I'm done with The Human Race ;).

  • Michael E | June 14, 2014 5:34 PMReply

    Surprise, surprise - Gabe Toro picking on a low rent flick and still finding time to jab at Damon Lindelof. Playlist, you can do better than trading on these terrible snark filled reviews. No one cares to hear you pat yourselves on the back.

  • OJ is innocent | June 14, 2014 7:47 PM

    Gabe Toro is to film criticism what orange juice (OJ) is to sex.

  • Karl | June 14, 2014 3:35 PMReply

    I know nothing about this film or the filmmakers, but this reviewer doesn't deserve to be credited as such. It's a shame that you get off on hate reviewing other people's work. And it's disturbing to see how much you revel in writing negative reviews. How is your own film career going, I wonder?

    If you're curious how to right a tactfully worded negative review maybe you should read some old Roger Ebert or Pauline Kael reviews and learn how to have a little dignity.

  • James Ralee | June 14, 2014 11:31 AMReply

    This is a shameful review. I've seen the movie and while I disagree with your opinion on the actual film - you do something much worse - which is reveal the final five minute twist in the movie. As I said, shameful. While you may sit there with glee because you have been given the chance to see it before others, to wreck the plot twist without warning it is just disgusting.

  • JAMES RALEE | June 15, 2014 4:53 PM

    I think you're missing the point. This isn't a debate about the movie. It's really why a critic can feel justified in wrecking the enjoyment of an entire movie without warning. If you haven't seen the film I won't ruin it for you (and like I say, I do disagree with Mr. Toro on his view of the movie (since while it certainly has its faults I still enjoyed it greatly. I watched it with three friends, two of whom absolutely hated it and one absolutely loved it (but this is not relevant here)). To explain in terms that might be more relatable - if you know the twist of The Crying Game or The Sixth Sense going in - then your enjoyment will be immediately skewed. There are places for criticisms like this - try the review site VideoVandals that destroys every movie out there. I just don't expect something this classless and disgusting from Indiewire.

  • Toby Renner | June 15, 2014 3:52 AM

    As disgusting as a pregnant woman's stomach exploding?

Email Updates