Review: 'Rare Exports' Is Not Quite As Bad As ' The Nutcracker 3D' (But Still Pretty Bad)

by Christopher Bell
December 2, 2010 10:45 AM
9 Comments
  • |


Dear Santa,

We're sorry our list is so late this year, but we've had a lot on our plates. Hopefully you understand our extremely busy nature. At the risk of sounding too showboat, it should be noted that we behaved very well for most, if not all of 2010. For what it's worth, we're only asking for one thing; maybe you can find it in your heart to reward us on such short notice.

What we want this year is a good, playful Christmas film that doesn't take itself too seriously, pleases audiences of every age, has charm, and isn't a dispensable bore. It may sound a bit demanding, but to be frank, you fucking owe us after "The Nutcracker in 3D."


Your most recent attempt at yuletide cinema, "Rare Exports: A Christmas Tale" (under the guise of Jalmari Helander), has not gone unnoticed but still leaves a lot to be desired. Sort of a bizarre experiment but mostly a misfire, the picture takes place in a small mountain town located in Finland, one that specializes in exporting reindeer. Things go awry when some English-speaking caricatures decide to do some mysterious excavating, discovering a frozen Santa Claus buried deep within the mountain. Spying on this unearthing are two boys, including our hero, young Pietari (newcomer Onni Tommila). His curiosity leads him to do painstaking research on the origin of old St. Nick, delving head first into age old books detailing in myths. Where he got them in this tiny locale is beside the point, as what he learns is foul: The jolly "Coca-Cola Santa" is fake, and the real one (encased in ice just a few miles away) is a devilish fiend, spanking naughty kids to their death. Unfortunately no one believes this young boy's story until it is too late: children are kidnapped (nobody else seems to notice, either), an elf (eschewing the little person fashion in favor of dirty old bum appearance) causes trouble with the locals, and Santa is this close to being thawed and slapping every child’s bottom into oblivion.

The different approach to yourself is appreciated; it's rare that this story of you is recognized and it's refreshing because of that. However, there is an inevitable bit of silliness to the entire plot, one that rarely gets acknowledged and is consequentially the downfall of the film. When the movie begins, the excavators speak of their find in the office and the tone is amusing. Chock full of b-level acting and bombastic music along with silly lines, the scene promises an enjoyable "Starship Troopers" type of comedy, a self-aware humor that is too scarcely used in cinema. Exterior scenes are gorgeous, and the snowy bleak landscape is oddly reminiscent of "Let the Right One In" (Tommila, also looks like Kodi Smit-McPhee from the previously mentioned movie's sister film). Things seem to be lookin’ good, Mr. Claus, although it’s certainly not one for the entire family, it feels unique and holds a great possibility of being good fun.

All this early promise is for naught, and before you can even attempt to take that first sip of watered down eggnog that Aunt Shanice can never make right, the film settles into its horror/thriller mold that it at first opted to mock. Instead of being purposely hokey with its seriousness, or even accidentally so, it settles for bland genre conventions. It could be forgiven if the story was at all, you know, creepy, but genuine unnerving moments are too few and far between, and even those cut away before delivering a legitimate jump. In lieu of these it focuses on tiresome exposition-only dialogue scenes, which wouldn't be so offensive if they didn't follow clichés with such blatant dedication. For example, Pietari discovers his friend missing and a creepy life-size doll in his place. He alerts the adults, to which they reply "He is probably out chasing women." Never mind that the kid is 12, or that the freakish mannequin in place came out of nowhere, or that - no shit - Pietari is right. The acting in these kind of scenes isn't believable enough, and it's too apparent that they're merely in existence to steer the plot in a certain direction. To bring back the earlier point, it's these kind of scenes which would really benefit from the self-knowing humor that Helander employs much too sparingly.

After a climactic "battle" in which everything seems lit by a Gameboy SP, its final moments opt for a weird, unwarranted Jean-Pierre Jeunet-esque ending, though it deserves credit for sticking with the overall scatter shot tone. One of the biggest questions remains: who is this movie for? It already alienates a certain audience because of its aesthetic and story, but it's not scary enough to attract the horror crowds and it's not funny or weird enough to attract cult devotees. All that aside, 'Rare Exports' functions as only two things, either "not as abysmal as Nutcracker 3D" or "just another forgettable holiday film."

Santa, what we're really looking for is some depth or charm. Movies like the French-drama "A Christmas Tale" and the raunchily-amusing "Bad Santa" were welcome additions to the honestly small set of staple holiday movies. For the most part they avoided gimmicks; when they were unavoidable they either used human complexity or creatively lewd humor to give a fresh spin on things. "Rare Exports: A Christmas Tale" attempts to try something interesting but gives up much too early and ends up being a severe waste of time. Sorry for being so harsh, but enough is enough. [D]

You might also like:
Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    

9 Comments

  • yo | December 3, 2010 4:37 AMReply

    i agree with Steve - in terms of sheer fun, this was one of the best movie experiences i've had all year.

    i wish it had better capitalized on some of the things it set up by taking them further, but overall i thought it managed to satirize certain elements of modern Christmas culture, without demistifying or undercutting the sense of child-like wonder the holiday's mythology engenders.

    not to mention some of the better moments are visually stunning in a tongue-in-cheek, over-the-top sort of way.

  • Steve Christmas | December 3, 2010 4:29 AMReply

    I saw it the other night at a preview screening and really enjoyed it. I also completely disagree that the movie turned into a film of "bland genre conventions". I think there was a playful/mocking tone throughout ( I certainly was laughing), mixed with a bit of scary.
    A really entertaining movie and it hits a nice register so that all members of your family will appreciate it on different levels.

  • Christopher Bell | December 3, 2010 3:25 AMReply

    Booboobear, at least know that I am honest with my feelings.

  • BoobooBear | December 3, 2010 2:45 AMReply

    Its not a perfect film, but even with its faults, its still the best genre movie this year. True, its just slightly too scary for kids and not quite scary enough for adults - but that's just like GREMLINS, which I love. You honestly think it's a "D"?

  • PT | December 3, 2010 1:53 AMReply

    this is another bad review for it:

    http://thecollectordamong.blogspot.com/p/reviews-and-rants_04.html

  • Christopher Bell | December 3, 2010 12:10 AMReply

    To each his own, but I really didn't find anything genuine about it.

  • rotch | December 2, 2010 11:49 AMReply

    "It's the sort of good spirited adventure story laced with genuine menace and frights and danger that was once a staple for young viewing audiences - think Gremlins, The Goonies and The Monster Squad" - Todd Brown, Twitchfilm

    That quote got me really excited, but I kind of trust Christopher more. I'll guess I'll see it anyways.

  • Charlie_Crotchman | December 2, 2010 11:19 AMReply

    It has a 97% fresh on Rotten Tomatoes. Most critics seem to love it.

  • rotch | December 2, 2010 11:10 AMReply

    I was really looking forward to this, before I read your review. Bummer.

Email Updates