Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

Sam Raimi Won't Direct 'Oz The Great & Powerful' Sequel; Finally Saw The 'Spider-Man' Remake

News
by Edward Davis
March 9, 2013 9:52 AM
6 Comments
  • |
Sam Raimi, Oz The Great & Powerful

Maybe it's kind of a restlessness we don't understand. After a rather pitiable box-office this past winter, one of the worst on record, "Oz The Great And Powerful," of all things, is somehow poised to make around $70 million this weekend. The expensive "Jack The Giant Slayer" movie proved not all fairy tale redos are a slam dunk and it bombed at the box-office last weekend with little signs of having any legs. But, 'Oz,' a film that received middling to OK reviews at best – we called it pretty to look at but otherwise dull – looks like it will be the first legitimate blockbuster of 2013 (and Disney is super relieved considering they spent upwards of $300 million on the film). A $70 million opening is not chump change and some of that might be pent-up demand. Audiences have been starving for a decent movie in early 2013 so far, and while 'Oz' still looks terrible to those of us who haven't seen it (this writer), apparently ok reviews are better than completely tepid ones.

This is a long way of saying, of course there's an "Oz The Great And Powerful" sequel in the works. This is how Hollywood works. This we know. But when that film does happen, director Sam Raimi won't be involved.

"I haven’t planned on directing the sequel," Raimi said (Coming Soon via Bleeding Cool). "I did leave some loose ends for another director if they want to make the picture... I was attracted to this story but I don’t think the second one would have the thing I would need to get me interested." That's certainly not what the studio wants you to hear because they surely believe the sequel will be even more lucrative – err, I mean, much more thrilling and fantastic. Are you bummed Raimi will go off and do something else? Do you care?

Meanwhile, Raimi recently admitted he had yet to see Marc Webb's "The Amazing Spider-Man." In fact, at one point he said he simply would not watch the film. "I don't want to go to my girlfriend's wedding," he said at the time making a metaphor of his former franchise. "I just can't bring myself to do it. I don't have the guts." Well, that's changed. Raimi finally saw the film, and guess what? He likes it.

"It was very hard for me to see the new Spider-Man movie, I felt so attached to it," he told Superhero Hype. "I couldn’t see Spider-Man with another director; it’s like my love, and I didn’t want to walk in on my love with someone else. It was just like that. Then I got over myself last week and said, ‘just see the damn thing’. And I did, and I loved it. I actually felt free. I thought, ‘why am I carrying around this baggage?’ Of course the next Spider-Man story should be told, and [Marc Webb] did a wonderful job telling that. I loved the movie, and I’m looking forward like a fan to the next instalment. I love the comic book, and now I don’t feel bound, and I’m really glad somebody’s remaking it again."

Hugs all around.

Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    

6 Comments

  • Derek Armstrong | April 30, 2014 10:10 PMReply

    In the Wizard of Oz remake in 2015,can we see Jennifer Lawrence as Dorothy Gale,James Franco will return as Oscar Diggs,
    Mia Kunis will reprise as the Wicked Witch of the West,John Cryer as Scarecrow
    Ed Westwick a.k.a Chuck Bass as Tin Lumberjack in Sci Fi Robot suit
    Bendict Camberbatch voiced as the Cowardly Lion in Cgi
    Michelle Williams will return as Glinda

  • Sam Raimi = Brilliant Director | March 9, 2013 2:40 PMReply

    "Oz The Great And Powerful," of all things", + "But, 'Oz,' a film that received middling to OK reviews at best – we called it pretty to look at but otherwise dull – looks like it will be the first legitimate blockbuster of 2013 (and Disney is super relieved considering they spent upwards of $300 million on the film).", it must be choking the critics who particularly had an AGENDA and went on the attack regarding James Franco (MOVIE STAR) plus this AWESOME movie in general that its started off so well at the box office, long may it continue.

    " 'Oz' still looks terrible to those of us who haven't seen it (this writer)", got to love your OPEN-MINDEDNESS, and he calls himself a critic.

    "apparently ok reviews are better than completely tepid ones.", some audience member's, it's not just ok but excellent. Oh plus, it didn't STOP, Alice in Wonderland, Twilight franchise, Transformers franchise, and Pirates of the Caribbean franchise all making money.

    Anyway, glad the general public is not listening to the critics and going out to experience this brilliant movie for themselves. It's not Wizard of Oz, because it has his own identity but just nods to the classic 1939. Franco was an amazing Oz, and everyone did great.

    Hopefully, Sam Raimi will change his mind at some point in the future, because he was masterful as a Director of this movie and make the sequel too.

  • judd.lormand | March 9, 2013 2:37 PMReply

    This writer is a bit of a hater, but on point. Ha. This movie was terrible.

  • derek christian | March 9, 2013 2:35 PMReply

    “Oz the Great and Powerful” is all smoke and no mirrors, no fantasy, just effects without affect. To be honest, more like Oz the Amiable and Un-threatening. The best, funniest Oz thing I've read lately is DA YELLER BRICK ROAD, a revisionist telling of The Wonderful Wizard of Oz by Uncle Remus. The conceit is it was originally by Remus (who didn't exist) and then "borrowed and cleaned-up" by Baum. Hilarious and charming. All that "Oz the Great and Powerful" is not.

  • Ian | March 9, 2013 1:40 PMReply

    The direction is pretty much the best thing about the movie, it certainly wasn't the script. Still FAR better than the similar Alice in Wonderland though.

    Definitely seemed like one of those "one for them, so I can make one for me" kind of efforts, so I'm not surprised he doesn't plan to churn out another.

  • John Glynn | March 9, 2013 10:58 AMReply

    It was horribly written and Mila Kunis is very poorly cast, but it was sorta nice to look at (cough Rachel Weisz).

Email Updates