Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

'Star Wars: Episode VII' Will Reportedly Be An Original Story, Lucas Biographer Says It Features An Older Luke Skywalker

by Kevin Jagernauth
October 31, 2012 4:44 PM
  • |
Disney Darth Vader

As you already know, yesterday came with it the monumental news that Disney had forked over $4 billion for Lucasfilm, and are launching a new "Star Wars" trilogy, with the first film slated to arrive in 2015. Of course, the internet nearly had a meltdown, and fans have been tossing around wishlists of directors (sorry guys, David Fincher will never come near this) and wondering aloud where the story will go next. In fact, we put together our own list of ways Disney may be approaching the next part of the saga, and also wondered if integrity can be restored to the franchise. Well, this is a step in the right direction.

Marking the beginning of what will likely be a three-year slow drip of information, a couple morsels about that treatment George Lucas has penned have emerged. "It's an original story," a Lucasfilm source told E!. So what does that exactly mean? If you were hoping for an adaptation of the fan-celebrated books in any capacity, guess again. Because it seems Lucas has again expanded things outward, with even more to toss into the already complex "Star Wars" universe.

The Wrap caught up with writer Dale Pollock, author of the unauthorized “Skywalking: The Life And Films Of George Lucas,” and he claims the filmmaker allowed him to read the outlines for his originally planned twelve-part story. So did he get access? Pollock apparently interviewed Lucas more than eighty times for the book, but the two wound up having a falling out. But Pollock's claims about what lies within those story outlines are intriguing.

“It was originally a 12-part saga,” Pollock said. “The three most exciting stories were 7, 8 and 9. They had propulsive action, really interesting new worlds, new characters. I remember thinking, ‘I want to see these 3 movies.’”

However, the part that will get "Star Wars" fans excited is that Pollock says the stories feature Luke Skywalker in his 30s or 40s. “They will need an older Luke Skywalker,” he says. So, sorry, probably no Mark Hamill.

Of course, whether this is accurate or not, or if Lucas scrapped that idea and came up with something else, remains to be seen. But it's pretty easy to see why Disney would be excited by the prospect of Luke Skywalker featuring in a brand new "Star Wars" trilogy. And all of this seems to suggest that the "original story" will indeed be a continuation of "Star Wars: Episode VI - Return of the Jedi."

Is this the right way for the series to go? Let us know...

  • |

More: Star Wars: Episode 7

Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    


  • Michael Dahlia | November 6, 2012 4:10 PMReply

    It'd be really cool if they put some Yuuzhan Vong staff in the sequels. Those guys don't look like someone to mess with

  • Lezlie | November 3, 2012 6:48 PMReply

    Let Michael Fassbender play Luke, that would be awesome :P

  • Mandy | November 1, 2012 6:26 PMReply

    I like a new Luke Skywalker, Princess Leia, and Han Solo of course Lando. I don't mind look at James Bond different guys play him it's longer Sean Connery, I'll get use to a new cast. Luke is getting a new love interest in the next Star Wars Epiosde 7 her name is Mara.

  • ronnie | November 30, 2012 7:06 PM

    they are not following the books, Mandy, they are going for ALL original

  • Ugh | November 1, 2012 5:35 AMReply

    Bullshit. Lucas has been making this crap up as he went along. Any "12 Part Saga" claptrap is fictional nonsense. The notes are as extensive as "Part 10 takes place on an Ice Planet... and there's like a Princess and some robots and a Squid.... yeah"

  • John | November 1, 2012 12:56 AMReply

    Star Trek is a prequel not a sequel. We need Harrison, Mark, Carrie and Billy back!!

  • seamus | November 7, 2012 7:53 AM

    NYAAAAH no its not, it takes place in an earlier time but not in the timeline that led to the entire star trek film series as we know it, because kirks daddy is dead, so really its a sequel, in fact its more of a reboot than anything else.


  • fred | October 31, 2012 9:23 PMReply

    LOL, that image rules.

  • bohmer | October 31, 2012 5:22 PMReply

    It's the right way to go, but the casting of new face for luke is gonna be very tricky but doable. I guess if we could go with new faces for Kirk, Spock & McCoy in Abrams' Star Trek, we could do it again with Skywalker.

  • Ronnie | November 30, 2012 7:08 PM

    it HAS to be an unknown actor for it to work as well as it did the first time

Email Updates