- By Oliver Lyttelton
- |
- January 24, 2012 9:32 AM
- |
- 0 Comments
We're reaching something of a watershed moment when it comes to the divide between TV and film. While the likes of "The Sopranos" and "The Wire" have seen the small screen gain more and more prestige over the last decade, and names like Martin Scorsese and Michael Mann have lent their names to projects, the big directors tend to helm the pilot, take an executive producer credit and move on, while the shows tend to be lead either by rising, relatively unknown stars (see Michael Pitt, Jon Hamm, Aaron Paul) or veteran character actors eager for a more substantial role (see James Gandolfini, Steve Buscemi, Peter Dinklage). Dustin Hoffman is probably the biggest name to head to TV to date, as the star of Mann's HBO show "Luck" which starts on Sunday, but while he's enormously respected, he's hardly an A-lister anymore -- he's not led a bona-fide hit himself since 1995's "Outbreak."
Recent Comments
Hell, Yeah !!!
I was excited to see this but the best and only thing that worked in this film was Kevin Costner and
does anyone know the name of the track they play when Cheyenne visits Mary's mother? it is not
I can't wait to see this at TIFF. it's going to be a very difficult film to watch, but I
I'm curious if this show chances will be hurt by the fact that Cinemax already has a Pulpy
In the first scene Why Florence (Rebecca Hall) directly know the game played by people, that there
Great movie, widely big bang, yes agree with comments before, my idol, Rebecca Hall is poor, nothing
For chrissake, Lena, sit down! The US intervened in WW2 when the Nazi army had already been
McQueen's films are intense; this film, from the sound of it, will be uncompromising in its
Can't wait to watch the film. McQueen always makes films that are made to be talked about and