- By Rodrigo Perez
- |
- May 3, 2013 12:45 PM
- |
- 3 Comments
The word "art" within the context of cinema can sometimes be embarrassing to use. Much of the "cinema," movies or film we consume is consumer-driven -- well-calibrated, committee-made popcorn to entertain the masses. And indie films made by auteurs -- cinema as recently defined by Steven Soderbergh (and arguably accepted by all) -- are often artfully made, but still doggedly linear and narratively conventional. That's OK, all forms of movies have their place in the world, and as Danny Boyle recently intimated, they are symbiotic -- we need both forms, the blockbuster, the indie, the escapism and the esoteric. No arguments there, but "art," like the term "genius" should be, in this writer's opinion, sparingly used.
Recent Comments
Also, blaming Pixar for things out of their control (such as commercial marketing) is unfair - that
A terrible article that misses so many of the great things in the films. You talk about the
I thoroughly enjoyed it. I feel the "old sport" catchphrase was 100% necessary. The
I liked Brave way more than Up - Pixar's worst in my opinion (haven't seen Cars 2)
Reg: your comment on Zack Snyder's name. I am somewhat inclined to believe that as well. Except
I saw that one on it´s release back then in Germany at age 14....and you can be sure that this is
Damn.... May he rest is peace. He was a MAGNIFICENT actor.
"...with a complete lack of progression to the narrative." "This man is not our
im not a grammar nazi in the slightest but dear lord can someone read over these posts just once
I totally disagree, the movie really wasn't spectacular. IT HAS NOTHING to do with Christopher