- By Kevin Jagernauth
- |
- January 24, 2013 6:16 PM
- |
- 5 Comments
So remember a couple of years ago when it was announced that The Weinstein Company and Miramax had made a deal which would basically allow them to sequelize everything in the catalogue, with rumors of follow-ups to "Rounders," "Shakespeare In Love," "Swingers" and more all tossed around? Well, Harvey Weinstein hasn't given up the idea of trying to franchise past ideas, only this time, it's a title he sort of didn't have anything to do with the first time around.
Recent Comments
Does anyone else think this sounds remarkably close to jj's answer before he accepted the job?
you contradict yourself alot especially with michael shannon criticism you say he had a deep rooted
And let me get this clear: you STILL wrote that it was a "stunning show of bad taste" for
I apologise. I assumed that people at The Playlist had different opinions. It turns out many have
Congratulations! I didn't write that part.
The movie was lacking any sort of real estate scheme by Lex Luthor and is therefore terrible.
Christ, my post had NOTHING to do with comics. In fact, the ONLY comic that featured in my post was
I found the movie weak due to very little character development. I liked, but not as much as Dark
Stop being a whiny fan boy and suck it up. I realize you have no life outside of comics, but even
Haha. Harsh. I think he meant a great eye for visuals but I see your point.