- By Edward Davis
- |
- June 7, 2012 10:22 PM
- |
- 16 Comments
As we were just mentioning this afternoon, "Green Lantern" is a huge blemish and disappointment for Warner Bros. Launched just as WB were putting the finishing touches on their super lucrative "Harry Potter" series ($7.7 billion worldwide), the studio was hoping "Green Lantern" would be the beginning of a chapter in leveraging DC Comics super hero properties in the manner their competition (Marvel Studios) had already been successfullly doing and beyond the likes of flagship characters like Batman and Superman. In fact, "Green Lantern" was very much akin to "Iron Man." A B-level character far from a household name, Marvel did the unthinkable, remade the character into their A-list star property. Utilizing a similar, humor-filled approach not so dark and brooding as Christopher Nolan's "The Dark Knight Rises," "Green Lantern" seemed to take some of its basic cues from "Iron Man," only missing all marks by miles.
Recent Comments
Spotted the brilliant Michael Smiley too.
"Without Brad, this film wouldn't have been made. Fact," WTF is up with movie
I'm confused as to why "a group of magicians and conmen who team up to use their powers of
Dirty Pretty Things was 2002, Hunger was 2008. No need to be competitive in this regard. It just
James Franco is a better movie critic than the more established ones out there. His reviews are very
James Franco should write a review analyzing the sequence in "This is The End" where him
shut up mark. you speak non sense.
yes leon the profesional should have won an oscar for best movie best actress natalie portman best
if he can manage a 3d projection with more light, let him bring it on. the fps thing makes me very
take out jeff bridges from crazy heart and the movie fall appart.