- By Sam Price
- |
- August 30, 2011 3:49 AM
- |
- 1 Comment
For anyone who has managed to go through their entire adult life without having seen “Dirty Dancing”: it's less a 1987 film about a seventeen year-old girl procreating with a lascivious Patrick Swayze, than a colossus that continues to bestride the world of cinema, distorting young boys’ and girls’ perception of romance along with it. Its drawbacks as a work of art, which are myriad, obvious and not really worth dwelling on, pale in comparison to the film’s continued profitability; if we needed further evidence of that, Deadline are reporting Lionsgate can provide it, as they have now tapped writer Maria Maggenti to pen an upcoming remake.
Recent Comments
So sick of people complaining about the action. It was amazing to finally see Superman unleash his
The benefit of high frame rate is "realism" - it gives things a very live look. And that
I saw it at a screening and it is not Django without the comedy. What utter crap. Sounds like
Well, at least this article was more possitive and more lifting than the "The Five Worst Things
Just what I needed, more Pixar hate. I'm starting to see why they called the
They couldn't throw any real money at Christian Bale to reprise the role for half a day? PS:
I expected to thoroughly enjoy this movie, because I like the genre , and Superman in particular...
This film will surely prove that Tarantino should of never made the type of slavery movie he did
The best superman movie ever
Except the Avengers did imply that someone got hurt in the battle in New York, as was shown in the