- By Drew Taylor
- |
- April 22, 2012 8:20 AM
- |
- 2 Comments
For some reason independent movies, especially the current wave of mumble-core with its earthy existentialism and waxy photographic quality, have the reputation of somehow being more “real” or “honest” than movies in the mainstream. Because these smaller movies arrive at some emotional truth more directly, they don’t have to dodge movie stars or CGI monsters. But watching a movie like USC grad Jay Gammill's “Free Samples,” which proudly wears its indie-ness on its sleeve like a badge of honor (when it’s really more of a disfiguring war wound), all you get are feelings of artificiality. It’s so phony and forced and cloying and cute, that you wonder how anyone could misdiagnose a movie like this as being more representative of the human experience than, say, something with werewolves or Tom Cruise.
Recent Comments
Just what I needed, more Pixar hate. I'm starting to see why they called the
They couldn't throw any real money at Christian Bale to reprise the role for half a day? PS:
I expected to thoroughly enjoy this movie, because I like the genre , and Superman in particular...
This film will surely prove that Tarantino should of never made the type of slavery movie he did
The best superman movie ever
Except the Avengers did imply that someone got hurt in the battle in New York, as was shown in the
the best superman movie i watch so far
Wow, posting an anti Pixar article on a site full of Pixar fan boys? You are a braver man than me.
The #1 problem with Pixar? They're not Studio Ghibli.
We still on this? lmao. Mark Waid. I love the dude but he's incorrect. To everyone still