- By Oliver Lyttelton
- |
- March 26, 2012 12:05 PM
- |
- 21 Comments
If you heard the sound of popping champagne corks and cheering in Los Angeles over the weekend, it’s more than likely that it was the celebrations over at Lionsgate HQ. The mini-major were built on low-budget genre fare like “Saw,” but hoped that their adaptation of young-adult publishing phenomenon “The Hunger Games,” co-written and directed by “Seabiscuit” helmer Gary Ross, would push them into the blockbuster game for the first time. And boy, did it ever. In only three days, it surpassed “Fahrenheit 9/11” as the company's biggest ever grosser, taking in around $155 million, making it the third biggest domestic opener of all time, and the most successful non-sequel ever. What’s more, with mostly positive reviews and an A-grade Cinemascore, the stage is set for two sequels that will be licences to print money.
Recent Comments
I personally think this is the best superhero film I have ever seen. It wasn't corny like I
Excellent article.
awesome. best fucking movie
I don't have much to say about the article, other than to address point #5 slightly.
I'm sorry. But i justed wasted time reading an article i thought was going to be constructive
trying to figure the movie out is one of the many joys of watching this. i know im not the smartest
anyone who thinks this blog is true....' can go **** himself/herself. cloud atlas is
Place Beyond the Pines is a modest hit, no doubt (and a terrific film!) but it had a $15 million
I thought that the movie could have been done without Lois Lane. In a city as massive as
My problem wasn't so much that supes killed zod, but that he barely had any time to reflect