- By Kevin Jagernauth
- |
- March 30, 2012 4:25 PM
- |
- 0 Comments
For a while there at the tail end of the '90s, it seemed like Amanda Peet was poised to be the next big thing. And then....well, that didn't exactly happen. Not that she stopped working, but it seems she wisely decided to work with respected talent on films like "Melinda & Melinda," "Syriana" and the severely underappreciated "Please Give" while still paying the bills with odd blockbusters like "2012" here and there. But her name is being mentioned a bit more these days. She's got a role in Terrence Malick's untitled romance, a new show on NBC, and now she's headed back to the big screen to deliver some comedy with two of the best in the business.
Recent Comments
These are movies for children. I think this article is a bit silly. Why would children's movies
I don't really get the buzz about Woodley- acting wise. I found her to be nothing special in
oh wow, I knew I'd get torn apart by her fans(the few of them she has anyways), however I know
This is a disgrace to Bale
dat editorialization.
My esteem for Armie Hammer has just gone up.
This side-by-side documentary should be required viewing for every movie critic at the Playlist to
Whaddya know, kanye west stealing someone else's idea...Didn't see that coming.(Sarcasm)
kanye is an odd, odd man, but he means no harm so i guess we can just let him be......for now...
So it made sense to have Mary Jane already established in Peter's life if they plan to kill