- By Oliver Lyttelton
- |
- August 15, 2012 2:08 PM
- |
- 8 Comments
There has been something of a trend recently for re-releasing older fare in 3D, with Disney and Pixar movies, "Titanic," "Star Wars" and, next summer, "Jurassic Park" and "Independence Day" all getting the treatment. It's the new-money-for-old-rope-approach to the movies, and while these aren't guaranteed phenomenons (although "Titanic" did extraordinarily well internationally, especially in China, and "The Lion King" topped the box office in the U.S. last fall), they've been something of a no-brainer so far, allowing studios to get many millions of dollars through fairly minimal effort.
Recent Comments
@JSNPAVA: I wasn't a huge fan of Thor as a whole, but I think Thor's general character arc
LOL.
I read it and it was dull. Had no idea so much was based off of Harry Potter/Buffy until
Does anyone else think this sounds remarkably close to jj's answer before he accepted the job?
you contradict yourself alot especially with michael shannon criticism you say he had a deep rooted
And let me get this clear: you STILL wrote that it was a "stunning show of bad taste" for
I apologise. I assumed that people at The Playlist had different opinions. It turns out many have
Congratulations! I didn't write that part.
The movie was lacking any sort of real estate scheme by Lex Luthor and is therefore terrible.
Christ, my post had NOTHING to do with comics. In fact, the ONLY comic that featured in my post was