- By Todd Gilchrist
- |
- November 7, 2011 7:39 AM
- |
- 0 Comments
An exercise of stultifying blandness and dramatic inertia, “J. Edgar” is second- or third-tier Eastwood, the sort of respectably proficient but forgettable work that he did all too often before “Million Dollar Baby” reminded audiences that one of Hollywood’s oldest dogs still has some fight in him. A sort of “Brokeback Mountain” for the blue-state set, the film operates dually as a chronicle of Hoover’s rise and fall as Director of the FBI, and a skillfully bloodless depiction of his complicated personal life, in particular his relationship with Associate Director Clyde Tolson. Undermined by old-age makeup, a story largely unbothered by chronology (or even dramatic momentum), and no throughlines or uniting themes other than what the characters dutifully explain, “J. Edgar” is a would-be prestige picture that’s sorely lacking in emotional power.
Recent Comments
This review may be the best example of "damning with faint praise" that I've read in
Making the Justice League without lead in solo films is yet another mistake the studio is making
Mary replied I didn't even know that some people able to get paid $4253 in 1 month on the
Mary replied I didn't even know that some people able to get paid $4253 in 1 month on the
Mary replied I didn't even know that some people able to get paid $4253 in 1 month on the
Mary replied I didn't even know that some people able to get paid $4253 in 1 month on the
Mary replied I didn't even know that some people able to get paid $4253 in 1 month on the
Hell, Yeah !!!
I was excited to see this but the best and only thing that worked in this film was Kevin Costner and
does anyone know the name of the track they play when Cheyenne visits Mary's mother? it is not