- By Oliver Lyttelton
- |
- June 7, 2013 8:56 AM
- |
- 18 Comments
"World War Z" was always going to be a difficult nut to crack. The book of the same name, by son-of-Mel Max Brooks, was a bestseller a few years back, and a somewhat atypical one; a brainy, grim faux oral history of a zombie apocalypse that wiped out most of the world's population. It made enough of a dent in pop culture to warrant a movie adaptation, but it wasn't going to be an easy translation with no main character and a documentary-like format. So it's no surprise that the film was several years in development, and that even once filming got underway, it had one of the more publicly troubled shoots in memory, with reports flying of budget overages, script triage and extensive pick ups.
Recent Comments
Does anyone else think this sounds remarkably close to jj's answer before he accepted the job?
you contradict yourself alot especially with michael shannon criticism you say he had a deep rooted
And let me get this clear: you STILL wrote that it was a "stunning show of bad taste" for
I apologise. I assumed that people at The Playlist had different opinions. It turns out many have
Congratulations! I didn't write that part.
The movie was lacking any sort of real estate scheme by Lex Luthor and is therefore terrible.
Christ, my post had NOTHING to do with comics. In fact, the ONLY comic that featured in my post was
I found the movie weak due to very little character development. I liked, but not as much as Dark
Stop being a whiny fan boy and suck it up. I realize you have no life outside of comics, but even
Haha. Harsh. I think he meant a great eye for visuals but I see your point.