- By Ryan Sartor
- |
- November 2, 2011 1:43 AM
- |
- 1 Comment
A lot has been made of the Oscar potential for Steven Spielberg’s still-unseen WWI epic “War Horse,” but the majority of that chatter has been for the Picture, Directing, Screenplay, and technical categories. Hardly anyone has mentioned the young lead of "War Horse," Jeremy Irvine, as a Best Actor contender. But, as Kristopher Tapley and Anne Thompson pointed out on their excellent Oscar Talk podcast, if "War Horse" is a hit with the Academy, the film’s actors could ride a tidal wave of goodwill right onto Nomination Shore. Stranger things have happened: See Ian McKellan’s Best Supporting Actor nomination for “Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring.” His performance in that film was good, but it wasn’t anything Sir Ian didn’t do in “X-Men.” The point is, when a film gets thirteen nominations—and if any film does this year, it could very well be "War Horse"—one of those nods will probably be for acting.
Recent Comments
im not a grammar nazi in the slightest but dear lord can someone read over these posts just once
I totally disagree, the movie really wasn't spectacular. IT HAS NOTHING to do with Christopher
What kind of fucked bullshit is this?.....oh wait....I said it....
"The are no WORST Pixar films . . . . there are some that are not as wonderful
I keep hearing great stuff about these series of books, but to be honest nothing about the film
the Martin Short episode( in season 2) as Uncle Jack is hilarious on all fronts. He kills it in
uh . . . Because it's Magicians and Con men fighting Hitler (cool enough already) written by
Whoa, I just pieced together the marriage of Aaron Johnson and Sam Taylor-Wood and I'm
Damn. He cut out like that last scene. Just... black. RIP
"Rango" is another film that replicated the anamorphic.