- By Edward Davis
- |
- June 7, 2012 10:22 PM
- |
- 16 Comments
As we were just mentioning this afternoon, "Green Lantern" is a huge blemish and disappointment for Warner Bros. Launched just as WB were putting the finishing touches on their super lucrative "Harry Potter" series ($7.7 billion worldwide), the studio was hoping "Green Lantern" would be the beginning of a chapter in leveraging DC Comics super hero properties in the manner their competition (Marvel Studios) had already been successfullly doing and beyond the likes of flagship characters like Batman and Superman. In fact, "Green Lantern" was very much akin to "Iron Man." A B-level character far from a household name, Marvel did the unthinkable, remade the character into their A-list star property. Utilizing a similar, humor-filled approach not so dark and brooding as Christopher Nolan's "The Dark Knight Rises," "Green Lantern" seemed to take some of its basic cues from "Iron Man," only missing all marks by miles.
Recent Comments
This probably sets up Lexcorp rebuilding the city and starting anti-Superman campaign.
Hey, this is the song she was mixing before the taxi arrives: www. youtube. com/ watch?v=gj
Titanium - David Guerra (:
So sick of people complaining about the action. It was amazing to finally see Superman unleash his
The benefit of high frame rate is "realism" - it gives things a very live look. And that
I saw it at a screening and it is not Django without the comedy. What utter crap. Sounds like
Well, at least this article was more possitive and more lifting than the "The Five Worst Things
Just what I needed, more Pixar hate. I'm starting to see why they called the
They couldn't throw any real money at Christian Bale to reprise the role for half a day? PS:
I expected to thoroughly enjoy this movie, because I like the genre , and Superman in particular...