- By Todd Gilchrist
- |
- September 29, 2011 1:03 AM
- |
- 0 Comments
As a person terrified by the prospect of encountering a shadowy figure in my apartment in the middle of the night, the “Paranormal Activity” movies work like gangbusters on this writer. On an intellectual level, It's genuinely admirable how effectively they’re able to wring significant suspense out of so little happening on screen, but in terms of visceral impact, they’re among the few horror films whose effect on this viewer lingered long after leaving the theater. “Paranormal Activity 3” is less effective than its predecessors, but it still works when and how it needs to. As a prequel to a prequel that further explored the supernatural world created by Oren Peli, the film unwittingly reveals the dwindling supply of ideas left to be injected into the franchise, both in conception and execution, even as it offers a finale mostly worthy of its predecessors.
Recent Comments
Even if money did change hands, I think it's distracting when movies want to be set in the
@JSNPAVA: I wasn't a huge fan of Thor as a whole, but I think Thor's general character arc
LOL.
I read it and it was dull. Had no idea so much was based off of Harry Potter/Buffy until
Does anyone else think this sounds remarkably close to jj's answer before he accepted the job?
you contradict yourself alot especially with michael shannon criticism you say he had a deep rooted
And let me get this clear: you STILL wrote that it was a "stunning show of bad taste" for
I apologise. I assumed that people at The Playlist had different opinions. It turns out many have
Congratulations! I didn't write that part.
The movie was lacking any sort of real estate scheme by Lex Luthor and is therefore terrible.