- By Oliver Lyttelton
- |
- January 14, 2011 2:09 AM
- |
- 0 Comments
Just over a year on, and we're still a little stunned by how entertaining Guy Ritchie's "Sherlock Holmes" turned out to be. Seemingly displaying the reboot mentality that's been Hollywood's curse the last few years, and coming from a director who hadn't turned out anything watchable in a decade, the film has its share of problems (principally the redundancy of Rachel McAdams' character and a sub-par final set piece), but the chemistry of its leads, Robert Downey Jr. and Jude Law, carried the picture, and ensured it was one of the more quietly enjoyable tentpoles in recent memory.
Recent Comments
I think those who appreciate the compassionate spirit and/or know the humbling history of
Yeah, I found that comparison to Django to be particularly clueless & I haven't even seen
VKATNYTE, So are you just gonna bitch out everyone who doesn't agree with you? You are about as
I'd really appreciate it if those of you who haven't seen the film would please not
I listened to this podcast - in double time - so I missed this part: "the film is 75 per cent
No one is bothered because it makes sense to this film. Obviously it would've been out of place
Lois had her part to play in the film and that is all..they didnt over or under use her-also
HaHa... Finally someone knows wtf they are talking about on here...
Did you even watch the movie or were you on an extended bathroom break? You seem to have missed the
Garbage? really? wtf movie were you expecting? Superman Returns?Grow up already!