- By Gabe Toro
- |
- November 9, 2010 3:35 AM
- |
- 4 Comments
Nine out of ten major blockbusters (maybe more?) of the last few years were based on pre-established names and brands. While the usual suspects produced completely awful movies, you'd be forgiven for hoping that Hollywood would learn some lessons from the more entertaining and satisfying successes. But when studios see something like "Pirates of the Caribbean" succeed, they don't think, "Oh, the audience craves high adventure and witty humorous comic interplay." They think, "We don't even need backstories to get saps to buy tickets to a name they recognize." 'Pirates' was certainly somewhat enjoyable, but would it have made $300 million domestic had it been titled, "The Pirates of the High Seas"?
Recent Comments
Why? So they can keep the rights and further produce even more TASM shite.
Worldwide Box Office for Olympus Has Fallen is at $154 million and still counting as of 6/16.
These are movies for children. I think this article is a bit silly. Why would children's movies
I don't really get the buzz about Woodley- acting wise. I found her to be nothing special in
oh wow, I knew I'd get torn apart by her fans(the few of them she has anyways), however I know
This is a disgrace to Bale
dat editorialization.
My esteem for Armie Hammer has just gone up.
This side-by-side documentary should be required viewing for every movie critic at the Playlist to
Whaddya know, kanye west stealing someone else's idea...Didn't see that coming.(Sarcasm)