- By Kevin Jagernauth
- |
- December 13, 2011 1:17 PM
- |
- 8 Comments
To say that Tony Gilroy has had a bumpy relationship with the Jason Bourne franchise would be an understatement. He has never been happy with what what Doug Liman did on "The Bourne Identity" (“Those works were never meant to be filmed,” he said dismissively about the Robert Ludlum books. “They weren’t about human behavior. They were about running to airports”) and was even less impressed by Paul Greengrass' work on "The Bourne Supremacy" ("It was sort of like a crime against the gods of storytelling," he said). But the films made money. Lots of money. And moreover, Universal didn't want to jinx their luck by trying to get new writers to take on the franchise for "The Bourne Ultimatum," so they essentially gave Gilroy everything he wanted to write the third movie. Gilroy got a shit-ton of money and added stipulations that he just had to turn in one draft, he would take no notes nor would anyone be allowed to oversee what he was doing. Prime working conditions for any writer, but according to Matt Damon, that was massive mistake.
Recent Comments
that's right, we saved you from the Nazis! Actually, the Russians saved you from the Nazis,
Initially, I was completely celestialized by the idea of a Christopher-Nolan-involved Superman
"Leon" would have to win at least two Oscars: The first to Natalie for this absolutely
Aeon, you have absolutely no clue whatsoever...
I like it your film
lol, your first time? I love the bull you emit. You just copy and pasted your same comment from
"I think one can make similar comparisons between Northup and Frank. They survived ..."
Please...you're the kind of people that always says "past times are better times"
So we are just going to ignore the part of the comics that says superman could not of snapped
I must say that I am really intrigued by Cumberbatch's role. Baptist preacher and slave