- By Joe Cunningham
- |
- September 14, 2012 1:26 PM
- |
- 3 Comments
It’s probably fair to say that when Lee Daniels premiered his followup to “Precious” at Cannes earlier this year, it was one that certainly got critics and audiences talking. "The Paperboy," starring Nicole Kidman, John Cusack, Matthew McConaughey, David Oyelowo and Zac Efron, split critics, with some heralding it as a complete misfire, while others found some merit within the film. So is it a disaster or a masterpiece? Well, we sided with the former and called it “a lurid, florid, humid, flaccid and insipid waste of money for the audience and for everyone who made it” before awarding it an F-grade.
Recent Comments
So sick of people complaining about the action. It was amazing to finally see Superman unleash his
The benefit of high frame rate is "realism" - it gives things a very live look. And that
I saw it at a screening and it is not Django without the comedy. What utter crap. Sounds like
Well, at least this article was more possitive and more lifting than the "The Five Worst Things
Just what I needed, more Pixar hate. I'm starting to see why they called the
They couldn't throw any real money at Christian Bale to reprise the role for half a day? PS:
I expected to thoroughly enjoy this movie, because I like the genre , and Superman in particular...
This film will surely prove that Tarantino should of never made the type of slavery movie he did
The best superman movie ever
Except the Avengers did imply that someone got hurt in the battle in New York, as was shown in the