Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

The Films Of Christopher Nolan: A Retrospective

Features
by Oliver Lyttelton
July 19, 2012 2:04 PM
25 Comments
  • |

We can all agree at this point that a certain sub-set of Christopher Nolan's fans are out of hand, what with the death threats to critics and all. But even if we were one of those who didn't like "The Dark Knight Rises," or indeed the rest of Nolan's output, we suspect that we'd still be glad he existed. While some might find his movies humorless (though we'd disagree), or chilly (though we'd disagree), or overly rigid (we'd... mostly disagree), no one else is making films like Christopher Nolan, taking nine figures of Warner Bros.' money, pairing it with big ideas and concepts, and making resoundingly entertaining and thought-provoking blockbusters.

 It's almost easy to forget that before he was making some of the biggest-scale movies in history, Nolan made his name on low-budget, ingenious film noirs. And yet, when you looking at the sub $10,000 "Following" or the $200 million "The Dark Knight Rises," you clearly see that it's from the same filmmaker. We're dying to see where Nolan goes from here, but in the meantime, with "The Dark Knight Rises" hitting theaters at midnight (read our review here), and feeling like the end of the first act of Nolan's career (the end of the franchise that made his name, seemingly his last collaboration with DoP Wally Pfister, who's heading off to become a director himself), it seemed like the right time to look back at the director's last fifteen years or so of movies. Check them out below, and let us know your own thoughts on Nolan in the comments section below.

"Following" (1998)
A writer (Jeremy Theobald) falls under the spell of a stranger, Cobb (Alex Haw, with a character whose name would return for the protagonist of "Inception"), who breaks into strangers' houses. The young man starts following in his new mentor's footsteps, only to fall for The Blonde (Lucy Russell), one of his victims, and ends up way over his head. A simple enough premise, but as we'd all come to learn about Christopher Nolan, that simplicity is deceptive. Shot on weekends on a tiny budget (about $6,000) over three or four months, not long after Nolan graduated from University College London (he was only 27 when the film was made), "Following," a nifty but rough-edged neo-noir, is certainly a victim of its limitations. Nolan served as his own DoP, and some of the handheld compositions are striking, but it occasionally feels a little amateurish, never coming close to the work Nolan would later do with Wally Pfister. The acting -- mostly by non-professionals (lead Jeremy Theobald is now a psychologist, Alex Haw is an architect, with only femme fatale Lucy Russell continuing to act -- she later led Eric Rohmer's "The Lady And The Duke") isn't the strongest, although partly because Nolan only shot one or two takes to conserve film stock. But the script does also showcase much of what would bring Nolan to fame; a fiendishly intricate structure and a taut pace that rattles along all kinds of twists and turns (though, there is arguably one too many) in a leaner-than-lean 70 minutes. It's a sketch for what would follow on, but one that shows the immense promise he held even at such a young age. [C+]

Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    

25 Comments

  • Raag | July 22, 2012 3:05 PMReply

    Excellent analysis, i must say. The Prestige and Inception are two of my favorite Nolan films as well, or rather i must say I consider them to be among the greatest films that I've ever seen. The Prestige was a movie that has simply blown me away during the first watch and even after multiple rewatches I get that same thrill and emotion that I had for the first time. The DarkKnight and Memento are 2 amazing films as well. I'm yet to catch Rises but would make sure to catch it in next few days time. And yeah, just to add, Nolan, for me is the greatest director in Hollywood right now.

  • Deep | July 22, 2012 4:13 AMReply

    Dark Knight is haunted tale and it is well made movie and Wow how great haters you are? Observing every bit of movie that what fans do You r best observer of this movie.
    Somewhat u liked this movie but pretending to hate this movie.

  • Amardeep | July 22, 2012 4:07 AMReply

    People have their own argument on Nolan's movie but it is real fact he that is most celebrated filmmakers in recent time you will not count him as greatest but he is better craftsman than any other great directors. For me and millions of people around the world he is great director than any movie director. In India people watch movies because it is directed by Nolan no other Hollywood director have that reputation. He make intelligent and sensible Cinema. Whatever the haters say but all his movies are above b grades for sure.

  • Schedel | July 21, 2012 7:43 AMReply

    Jim was afraid his family would be targeted by the Joker- he says something implying this in the film, I believe.

  • quickV | July 20, 2012 11:07 PMReply

    Following was much better than Insomnia in my opinion. Much, much better. I loved Following. The plot was simple and intriguing, the acting was good, and the progression, structure, and payoff was spot on.
    Batman Begins had some bright moments, but overall the "cheap" blockbuster look during the final scenes with the train hurtling around did it in for me. Still enjoyable though.
    Loved Inception, thought that The Dark Knight was really good, very much enjoyed The Prestige and Memento too. Not the biggest fan of Insomnia...
    I'd love to see someone else direct Inception without the exposition. See how coherent it is. Creating a world, a technology, whole concepts about concepts would require some explaining :)

  • zatopek | July 19, 2012 4:54 PMReply

    Exposition.. I mean Inception is hardly A. More like B or B+, like The Dark Knight.

  • TXW | July 19, 2012 4:54 PMReply

    TDK is a superficial, sloppy mess. Crib notes from Heat transcoded into a poorly plotted, inexplicably motivated slosh. It has like 50 aerial expository shots, but otherwise it's cramped and flat. It 'provokes' themes, perhaps, sets up reductive dualisms, yes -- then lets them stew. It has no perspective. The film dramatizes none of its thematic threads -- everyone just talks about them. Freeman is outraged by the breach in privacy inherent in that sonar nonsense (great, we get it), the Joker raves in pseudo-profundity about nihilism and chaos, Gordon expounds on Batman as symbol (-- and can we get much more didactic than that ridiculous boat scene?). So, awesome: platitudes and binaries. The boring chit-chat/talking-for-our-benefit scenes are then interspersed with the aforementioned aerials and a few spatially incomprehensible action scenes. Ledger gives a one dimensional performance, as does Gyllenhaal -- one all jitters and cheese, the other a vapid flirt who undoes all the solid groundwork laid by Holmes. All sense of Batman Begin's psychological realism is gone; yes, BB has terribly blocked and shot action, but otherwise it's a much, much tighter film (one whose Gotham isn't just Chicago or New York, too, which is nice). Batman/Wayne in TDK -- the most/only interesting character -- gets lost in the shuffle of plots, villains, deaths, double-crosses, and cops with one-liners. The film rushes through its convoluted amalgam of cliches and Mann-aped cinematography, talks out its dubious 'themes,' and then ends on a note that makes no sense. The Joker can't take the fall? cuz it's not like people believe everything the news tells them (but no, Gordon says, you can't cover up a few cops deaths when the city's been in a panic for the past few weeks and a bunch of cops and civil servants are already dead -- right...) Begins is Nolan's best film, Insomnia second, TDK worst, the others hovering in 6-7/10 territory. He's not a totally untalented director, but he relies on telling not showing (using faux-'epic' [I'm using internet movie-dork idiom here] visual tricks to cover that up and appear more cinematic [the aerials, the big actions set pieces, Batman standing on a 50 story building every fifteen minutes, dollying-in for every line delivery ever]), and on incredibly convoluted plots that, yes, raise questions, and are praised for it despite -- and here comes an important yet little discussed fact -- their triviality or minor applicability to lived human life (the high concept MO, dealing in thought experiment pseduo-thematics). In summation, this list sucks

  • tristan eldritch | July 19, 2012 5:09 PM

    Dude, your description of Dark Knight is 100% dead-on accurate. I have NEVER understood the Dark Knight phenomenon; it seems like some form of prolonged mass hysteria. I would be somewhat kinder to Ledger's performance, but other than that, everything you say is spot-on.

  • Tom | July 19, 2012 4:20 PMReply

    Ouch, harsh grade for Following. It's rough around the edges to be sure, but I'd say it's much better than you give it credit for. Also, the exposition nearly killed Inception for me. I really must give it another chance, perhaps I can go into it with adjusted expectations.

  • Jake | July 19, 2012 4:18 PMReply

    Can we talk about how terrible Eric Roberts is in The Dark Knight?

  • Nolan | July 19, 2012 3:44 PMReply

    I agree that Batman Begins is actually relatively weak. The initial reaction most had to it was more of a "wow, this is actually surprisingly pretty good" rather than "OMFG THIS IS SO GOOD NOLAN IS A VISIONARY", which is how everything he does now is perceived. But, it's interesting that you only call out Begins as having third act problems when, really, everything he's done SINCE Begins has had the same problems. TDK is 20 minutes and one needless setpiece too long, Inception completely goes off the rails once we get to the weird, Metal Gear Solid-esque snow-fortress set, and Prestige ends up trying to be too clever for it's own good as it winds down. I can't speal for TDKR, but I really do hope that he's figured out how to write a third act.

  • AS | July 19, 2012 4:13 PM

    I agree with you about Batman Begins but the biggest problems about that film, for me, are the performances. Everyone gives Nolan credit for taking Batman in a new direction with Begins, but actually, after the first hour, it's a by the numbers comic book movie. There are way too many cheesy moments (obligatory homeless guy going "nice wheels," cops looking up in wonderment as Batman jumps off a building, cutaways to cops having stupid pseudo-comic reactions to Batman driving across a roof) and embarrassingly weak performances (Katie Holmes, Mark Boone Junior, Colin McFarlane and an over-the-top Cillian Murphy). The film is at its best when Bale and Neeson share the screen. For a super hero movie it's good, for a movie-movie it's decent. I disagree with you, however, when it comes to the final acts of his films. As much as I like The Dark Knight, it's the first hour of that film that really struggles (again, mostly due weak performances, i.e. Michael Jai White). As the film moves along, it gets better and better, building to a terrific climax. Same goes for Inception (although, Inception doesn't really suffer from any weak performances, which is why it's my favorite of Nolan's films). In the beginning, Nolan has to deal with a lot of exposition but as the story starts to unravel, the film becomes more and more engaging.

  • sfdsf | July 19, 2012 3:23 PMReply

    Wow, your problems with Batman Begins are SO fishy. Batman Begins has some majorly misunderstood action scene aestetics. Nolan puts you in the shoes of the bad guys and therefore the action/fighting scenes are disorienting, chaotic and scary - just in line with the theme of fear! You've failed, Oliver. And Liam Neeson being hammy? Give me a fucking brake, you elitist tool!

  • HanTorso | August 15, 2012 6:04 PM

    The whole "the fight scenes come from the bad guys perspective" is such a weak defense of these awful action scenes. Liam Neeson didn't seem scared of Batman at all, so why was the fight with him shot incoherently. The same goes for the opening fight scene in the prison, and the fight with the Foot Clan members who had the same training Batman did. Way to try and rationalize a terrible movie.

  • Ryan | July 25, 2012 12:22 AM

    Calm down, fan boy.

  • A Hipster's Worst Nightmare | July 19, 2012 3:16 PMReply

    The jim gordon death has to happen in order to give the audience the illusion that chaos has taken over Gotham; that the stakes are high. It also sets up Harvey Dent's following scene with the Arkham patient; that even the white knight is corruptable when the Joker's chaos reigns. Don't try to be too smart all time, Playlisters, sometimes your critique is obviously fishy.

  • Mike | July 19, 2012 3:12 PMReply

    Secondly, while I agree with you wholeheartedly that Insomnia features Al Pacino's last great big screen performance, he has done plenty of excellent work since then in things like Angels in America, and You Don't Know Jack.

  • Mike | July 19, 2012 3:11 PMReply

    I completely disagree on Batman Begins, its my favorite Batman movie because it focuses on Bruce Wayne as a living, breathing, psychological character, not the alter ego of a masked vigilante that plays second fiddle to a cavalcade of scenery-chewing villains. The Dark Knight is a thrill to be sure, but Bruce Wayne and even Batman is shoved aside into a part of an ensemble, and as electrifying as Ledger was, an antagonist with some tangible story or motivation makes a film more engaging for me. Plus I'd much rather we had more slightly unhinged but grounded villains & those not depicted on screen previously like Scarecrow here than what we got in the following films.

  • Day | July 19, 2012 2:50 PMReply

    Oh my god. Thank you for giving The Prestige top marks. I am a huge Christopher Nolan fan and was having a conversation with my friend the other day, I told him, while The Dark Knight and Inception are cool films, in my opinion when I went back to watch them for a second time, I couldn't really get anything new out of them. The Prestige is my favorite of all of Nolan's work, it has a way of always revealing something new. I also hope he tunes down the big budget projects and goes for something more intiment. With that said, cannot wait for The Dark Knight Rises!!!

  • Christian | July 19, 2012 2:45 PMReply

    The Batman Begins hate is ... just wrong!

  • Charles | July 19, 2012 2:47 PM

    Amen to that. Batman Begins provided the solid foundation for the rest of the series.

  • DG | July 19, 2012 2:39 PMReply

    Switch the scores around for Inception and Dark Knight and you've nailed it. Also I liked the Scarecrow's hallucination scenes but agree some of the action stuff in Begnins kind of fell apart.

  • cirkusfolk | July 19, 2012 2:28 PMReply

    This is your best director's retrospective yet. Not only do I agree with everyone of the grades for each film but the write ups for each are spot on, especially with regards to Batman Begins. Awesome job.

  • Brian Z | July 19, 2012 2:40 PM

    I would argue pretty heavily against Nolan as the greatest. If you love him, that's fine, he's definitely super talented. For me, I'd still go with Almodovar, Haneke, Cuaron, Fincher, Soderbergh, the Dardennes, Assayas, Desplechin and a few others over Nolan. Which isn't to say he's not great, just not the greatest today in my eyes.

  • cirkusfolk | July 19, 2012 2:31 PM

    Should've included The Dark Knight Rises as well though. So with that being said, how can anyone argue Nolan isn't the greatest director working today. Four A's a B and a C. That's quite a report card when compared to all the other directors you've already done retrospectives on, cough cough, Ridley Scott.

Email Updates