Review: 'Only God Forgives'
5 Doomed Romance Leonardo DiCaprio Movi ...
Wes Anderson's 5 Best Commercials
Can 'World War Z' Break Even?
Steve Soderbergh On Cinema, Studios, Mor ...
Recap: 'The King Of Comedy' 30th Anniversary ...
Excl: Lake Bell Joins 'Million Dollar Ar ...
10 Essential Cinematic Antiheroes
“Bad Timing: A Sensual Obsession" (1980)
A mutually self-destructive May-December romance between an older jealous psychiatrist who doesn't subscribe to the terms "normal" and "mad,” and a secretive and mercurial 25-year-old student is a recipe for disaster in Nicolas Roeg's 1980 sexual obsession psychodrama, "Bad Timing." Told in serrated, frenetic flashbacks (naturally) and starring Roeg's belle du jour Theresa Russell (they were involved romantically shortly thereafter and married in 1982) and Art Garfunkel, the elliptically, often jarringly communicated drama centers on the couple's quickly-growing damaged romance, his paranoia and jealousy, and her subsequent psychological breakdown and attempted suicide. Set in Vienna, Harvey Keitel also stars as an American detective trying to get to the bottom of her overdose while Denholm Elliot plays an old lover. As is often the case in Roeg films, conspicuous cinematic conventions steal most of the scenes -- agitated, clipped editing, conspicuous zooms and 4th-wall-breaking protagonists smiling at the camera psychotically, etc. Disturbing and rather cretinous in its excruciating ending, the film was originally rated X and then somehow was toned down to make an R-rating, but still cemented Roeg’s reputation as a Brit-perv on par with Ken Russell, only more tasteless. A fractured look at the collision of love, sex, obsession, control and the desire to belong, as the films central mystery unfolds, it all begins to border on melodrama, but Roeg’s dyslexic narrative leaves you ultimately shocked and senseless. [B+]
“Eureka" (1983)
Towards the beginning of “Eureka,” Roeg’s manic excoriation of the corrupting nature of capitalism and mankind’s essential rapacity towards nature, society and each other, frustrated prospector Jack McCann (a mad-eyed Gene Hackman) staggering around the Yukon encounters a grinning vagrant. “What are you smiling at?” Hackman shoots at him. The bum rasps, “The end!” and then proceeds to blow his brains out. It’s a neat parallel for what the film would come to represent in Roeg’s own legacy – a self-sabotaging endeavor that all but ended his career in America, and a curio that has remained largely dormant since its release and subsequent burial in 1983. Its stature has grown over the years, with some taking Hackman’s McCann as a precursor to Daniel Planview in “There Will Be Blood,” and it remains a tough, infrequently brilliant picture. Its quicksilver plotting affords far too much time to a drippy romance between Theresa Russell and her tempestuous beau (Rutger Hauer) instead of Hackman’s rumpled quasi-Midas who wallows in material wealth and spiritual impoverishment. And although Paul Mayersberg’s script is frequently absurd and overly literal (“I don’t want your gold! I want flesh!”), eventually descending into out-and-out dull courtroom farce, it proved that Roeg could still film an old geezer getting flambéed by a blowtorch or a loco pansexual voodoo orgy like nobody’s business. The British filmmakers that have since cited the director as a formative influence – Danny Boyle and Christopher Nolan – seem laughably pedestrian by contrast. [B]
“Insignificance" (1985)
In the Nabokov story “Signs and Symbols” (so good they should put it in the water), the protagonist suffers from “referential mania”: he sees significance in everything. Thinking about 1985's "Insignificance" -- its title is just the first riddle -- we know how he feels: every object, person and event seems to refer to something else within the film, and to things without. Watches, blood, Hiroshima, shoes, lookalikes, relativity and the relationship between baseball and gum -- the film layers theme upon motif to such a pitch of semantic hullaballoo that the climactic holocaust is kind of a relief (also it allows us an unforgettable image of a twirling Marilyn with her skirt on fire.) The plot: unnamed versions of Albert Einstein, Marilyn Monroe, Joe di Maggio and Sen. Joe McCarthy collide over the course of a single night in a strange mix of psychological/political commentary and fan fiction. Adapted for screen by the original play’s writer Terry Johnson, the film is talky and at times the performances feel telegraphed: The Actress is played by Roeg's then-wife Theresa Russell with a breathy capriciousness that, initially at least, borders on caricature. But these are deliberate choices; the staginess makes the moments of ‘pure’ cinema -- like the quick edits to surreal scenes remembered or imagined -- all the more effective, even as the soundtrack veers wildly from apropos to anachronistic. It's a fascinating house of mirrors reflecting infinite distortions of the nature of identity, fame, intelligence, the (im)possibility of human connection and either the utter significance, or the complete insignificance, of everything. Out as of last week on the Criterion label, this is a film we love, even if thinking about it makes us feel like The Actress when she looks at the stars: small and lonely. Oh, and kind of stupid, too. [A-]
Why 'Star Trek Into Darkness' Suggests J.J. Abrams Needs To Leave His Mystery Box Alone For A While
11 Comments
Ondra | June 27, 2011 1:32 AM
Personally, I think Two death are pretty decent film, definitely not among Roeg's masterpieces, but worth mentioning more than "forgotten oddity"
However, great article, thanks... don't you know anything about movie he is supposedly preparing "Night Train" with Sigourney Weraver ?
Mr. Arkadin | June 24, 2011 9:48 AM
“Walkabout” (1971) [b][A+][/b]
fixed
DL | June 24, 2011 2:19 AM
As someone who worked on Puffball, I hate that it turned out this way. I think it was a promising film butchered by poor editing, score and SFX. Oh well, que sera...
jimmiescoffee | June 23, 2011 9:42 AM
did you guys ranks 'Don’t Look Now' an A+ before TIME OUT list? seems like that flick is getting NEW recognition.
bugaloo | June 23, 2011 9:00 AM
I agree it was pretty dreadful, but describing "Puffball" as a "horror flick" suggests the author didn't actually see it--it's got a supernatural aspect but is far from classifiable as horror, aiming more for whimsy than scares.
Catie T | June 23, 2011 8:04 AM
Love Don't Look Now and anything with the amazing Theresa Russell in it! She was one of the most underrated actresses ever. Her performance in Bad Timing is sublime, and in Insignificance beyond brilliant. No one has captured Marilyn Monroe's essence and spirit better that Ms Russell. God love her! And, of course, the brilliant tortured amazing Mr Roeg!
DaveT | June 23, 2011 6:42 AM
I kinda want to know more about the dodgy lost films, even the late 80s/90s ones...it'd save us having to watch them, at least. But nice article. Eureka definitely sounds worth a watch.
Nik Grape | June 23, 2011 6:13 AM
I only remember watching "The Witches" when i was young and it scared the shit out of me.
This is one director I have yet to explore. This article does good in peaking my interest even more. Great stuff.
hank | June 23, 2011 6:08 AM
Brilliant director. Your being very kind with your description of "Castaway" as watchable, though.
rotch | June 23, 2011 5:07 AM
Great, great write-up. Roeg is the film buff's most underrated filmaker par excellence.
TheoC | June 23, 2011 4:37 AM
Brilliant.
I had forgotten all about The Witches. Insignificance sounds brilliantly odd and anything that reminds me of 'symbols and signs' tends to give me a boner. Thanks
Great feature, well done all involved.
I'm a midget with a mask on.