Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

TIFF Review: Joss Whedon's 'Much Ado About Nothing' Is An Unexpected Delight

by Christopher Schobert
September 10, 2012 10:02 AM
  • |
Much Ado About Nothing, Joss Whedon, Nathon Fillion

How does one follow the biggest superhero film in box office history? Perhaps a better way to phrase it is, how does the man behind some of the most beloved cult TV series and characters in recent pop history follow the biggest superhero film in box office history? If we're talking about the much-loved Joss Whedon – who else? – you decamp to your home, grab a camera, invite over your friends, and create a delightful, DIY, modern-day black-and-white adaptation of Shakespeare's "Much Ado About Nothing." Duh.

The result is an utter joy, Whedon's most emotionally resonant and fully realized feature film to date. And I say that as one who is not a devoted member of the Whedon army. It's not that I haven't enjoyed much of his work – I have, often. But I’ve not seen every episode of "Buffy" and "Firefly," I never meandered into "Dollhouse," and I thought "Dr. Horrible" was worth one viewing, but no more. Happily, outside of actor recognition, Whedon fanaticism is not a requirement to enjoy “Much Ado.”

Much Ado About Nothing, Joss Whedon

Sure, "Firefly" fans will get an especially sharp kick out of seeing Nathan Fillion's Dogberry react with horrified shock to being called an ass. But so will everyone else, and that's Whedon's genius here. He has created a Shakespeare adaptation that will please just about everyone. No easy task, that, especially since the first scene of the actor's speaking Shakespeare's dialogue feels jarring. Sure, modern-day versions retaining the original language have worked before … But will it here, in sunny, privileged Santa Monica? And will it be more than just another Bard adaptation? The whole project, after all, seemed to come out of nowhere, leaving one unsure what to expect. But we were wrong to worry. Whedon pulls it off, and makes us blush for having doubted that he could.

This incarnation of "Much Ado" was shot over twelve days entirely at the director's home, making this a sort of geek Architectural Digest spread come to life. For the uninitiated, or those who perhaps haven’t come upon the text since high school (like me), the film opens with the arrival of Don Pedro and company to the home of the wealthy and charming Leonato (a never-better Clark Gregg). His right-hand man, young Claudio (Franz Kline) is in love with Leonato's daughter, Hero (Jillian Morgese), a match eased along by the cheerfully meddlesome Don Pedro.

Meanwhile, one member of the Don Pedro party, the caddish Benedick (Alexis Denisof) has a checkered past with Leo's tart-tongued niece, Beatrice (Amy Acker). The duo form the film's most irresistible couple, both sharing a seemingly unbreakable bond of disgust. This is due to the crisp, wonderfully meaningful Bill Shakespeare dialogue (“When I said I would die a bachelor,” opines Benedick, “I did not think I should live till I was married”), but also its two stars.

Much Ado About Nothing

I was unfamiliar with Denisof and Acker, both Whedon regulars from “Buffy” and “Dollhouse,” respectively, but I can say without question that “Much Ado” should make them stars – or bigger stars, depending on your knowledge of the Joss-ary. Via knowing glances, sharp put downs, and truly funny pratfalls, they bring Benedick and Beatrice to life in vivid fashion. Part of the fun of watching (and reading) “Much Ado About Nothing” is witnessing the clever series of pranks at its heart, and none is more enjoyable than the attempted union of B and B, with Denisof and Acker creating one of 2012’s most winning onscreen couples.

There are darker tricks afoot, as Claudio’s scheming brother Don John (Sean Maher) attempts to break the forthcoming marriage of Caudio and Hero. It is to Whedon’s and the actors’ credit that even knowing the story’s twists and turns, one finds the slander of Hero and, especially, the anger of her cousin Beatrice, so moving. Even during the film’s most love-sick stretch, there is humor, arriving in the form of Fillion’s Dogberry. As the buffoonish cop whose team discovers Don John’s plan, Fillion brings a burst of Whedon-y spirit to the proceedings, and despite little screen time, gives one of the film’s most memorable and subtle performances.

Much Ado About Nothing, Joss Whedon

“Much Ado About Nothing” appropriately ends with lovers united, evildoers punished, and, in this incarnation, a helluva party. Perhaps the film’s greatest accomplishment is the feeling this conclusion brings, one of smiles and joy. Watching Whedon’s take is a bit like sitting in on a dinner party of friends who feel not obnoxious, but friendly and lovable. Is it all a bit slight, and sometimes even amateurish? Sure, but that’s what happens when a group of friends make a film over twelve days. Its off-the-cuff nature makes for a film that is not flawless – the music is a bit daft, and some of the acting a little too “large” for the intimate setting – but is, from beginning to end, delightful. One gets the sense that this is less of an “Avengers” stop-gap for its director, and more a bold little battery-charger. Whatever Whedon’s intent, for audiences, it is one of 2012’s most unexpected treats. [A-]

Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    


  • mpbstereo | September 11, 2012 12:39 AMReply

    Denisof and Acker were not just regulars on Angel, their characters were a very fucking tragic romance. They've had practice.

  • LFire | September 11, 2012 5:59 PM

    You said it! Angel had by far and away the best character journeys of all Joss's shows. And Wes & Fred were as starcrossed and tragic a romance as there has been on TV. Whedon has always known how to twist the knife deliciously and Denisof and Acker played it beautifully. As actors they have always been among the best of his 'cadre', turning their hands easily to both comedy and drama. Denisof bringing Wes from foppish buffoon, to confident group leader, to bitter hard ass loner, and finally soul sick shell of a man, remains a tour de force character arc in my opinion. And Acker's flick of the switch turn from Fred's goofily sweet natured genius to the imperious, railing force of nature that was Illyria is still gobsmacking. I hope this movie brings them the higher profile they have both long deserved.

  • mpbstereo | September 11, 2012 9:41 AM

    At it's peak (S5, the show really got better with each season), Angel was better than Buffy, though not by much. But yeah, Wesley and Fred, man, Denisof was engaged in some world class pining for years.

  • LoriB | September 11, 2012 2:15 AM

    True. Denisof and Acker were wonderful as Wesley and Fred and I can't wait to see them together in one of my favorite plays.

    Based on the character development and interpersonal conflict/chemistry, I believe "Angel" was far and away the best and most mature show Whedon has done.

  • Tanya Marsh | September 10, 2012 10:37 PMReply

    Also, "Franz Kline" is really "Fran Kranz." And he's awesome.

  • Houman | September 10, 2012 12:57 PMReply

    Denisof and Acker were both regulars on Angel.

  • Rodion | September 10, 2012 10:25 AMReply

    It was made by Joss Whedon. A failure would have been unexpected.

  • subha | September 11, 2012 12:53 AM

    failure is unexpected and probably impossible.

Email Updates