Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

TIFF Review: Manic & Meta 'Seven Psychopaths' Both Exhausts & Delights

Reviews
by Kevin Jagernauth
September 8, 2012 10:46 AM
14 Comments
  • |

It would seem that following the success of "In Bruges," writer/director Martin McDonagh went to Hollywood -- and didn't like the experience. A meta riff on making movies "Seven Psychopaths" is a sneering send-up of the industry that also revels in its action movie clichés. But if there is one thing certain about McDonagh's sophomore feature film, it's that it's bigger in every sense than his debut. Boasting lots of gunplay, a big extended cast of stars willing to play along and a less witty, broader sense of humor, McDonagh tries to have it both ways by playing to the cheap seats while pointing out how absurd it is at the same time.

In a nutshell, the story follows Marty (Colin Farrell) who is struggling from writer's block on his new screenplay for which he only has a few vague ideas and a title so far which is, you guessed it, "Seven Psychopaths." But that's hardly all he has to worry about. His constant drinking is driving his girlfriend Kaya (Abbie Cornish) away, while his best friend Billy (Sam Rockwell) tries to assist with story ideas that are the total opposite of Marty's goal to write something with heart. But all this gets pushed to the side once Marty becomes unwittingly involved in the standoff between Billy, his friend Hans (Christopher Walken) and gangster Charlie (Woody Harrelson), when they kidnap his dog to hold it for ransom.

Add into the mix a subplot involving Hans' cancer striken wife and a mysterious masked killer who is going around taking down underworld figures, and "Seven Psychopaths" has a lot of narrative balls to juggle, and doesn't always handle them satisfactorily. Now toss in a handful of dream/fantasy sequences as well, and it makes it all the more odd that the film struggles to maintain a sense of pacing, with things considerably sagging in the middle.

And while the various digressions from the main thread are usually meant as some kind of winking commentary on the process of making movies, McDonagh misses the opportunity to take it one step further. At one point Marty is told his female characters are particularly poorly written and thus -- ha ha -- Cornish and Olga Kurylenko (who plays Charlie's girlfriend) don't get much to do except whine and wear a wet t-shirt (the former) and roll around in lingerie (the latter). Wouldn't a true subversion of action movie tropes be to give them something more substantial to do? And in regards to the cast as a whole, while the marketing has played up the various stars in the picture, most of them are reduced to extended cameo status, with the picture essentially positioned around Rockwell, Farrell and Walken.

And it's really those three that carry the film through its less inspired patches. Farrell is essentially the straight man to the zaniness going on around him, while Walken is Walken and McDonagh gets pretty good mileage out of the actor's trademark delivery (his line reading of the word "hallucinogens" might be worth the price of admission alone). But it's Rockwell who audiences will be talking about most. Always an actor we want to see more of, here he emerges as the lead character and has a blast playing the unhinged and unfiltered Billy whose increasingly self destructive tendencies come to a boil as the movie winds torward its conclusion.

It's hard to tell if those who loved "In Bruges" will dig "Seven Psychopaths." Where the former film had a tightly honed and focused story coupled with a laidback attitude that let its irreverence and witty dialogue breathe and sing, 'Psychopaths' is a different beast altogether. It's a constantly moving animal with violence usually played for laughs and dialogue and scenes not so much crafted, as swung and punched out wildly hoping that something sticks. The quantity of gags is both larger but also less refined, which means 'Psychopaths' tends to be a movie with a hit/miss ratio that will depend on your tolerance for the film's restlessness, and a story that doesn't really go anywhere and prefers a body count to actual narrative beats. (But yes, when it does hit, it's quite funny).

By turns manic and exhausting, "Seven Psychopaths" is a movie that would hum at a trim and tight 80-90 minutes but feels overlong and baggy coming in at nearly two hours. Some are already (lazily) calling it a Quentin Tarantino-esque film that will be a future cult classic, but we're not so sure. At its worst, it does feel like any number of post-"Pulp Fiction" movies that arrived in the '90s but that's hardly a compliment and it lacks the finesse and freshness of "In Bruges." Moreover, its meta narrative about the movies doesn't add anything to that subject that we haven't already seen in other movies. Somewhat spastic and overcooked, "Seven Psychopaths" might have a few too many. [C]

Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    

14 Comments

  • Claire Mc Gonagle | January 18, 2013 9:03 PMReply

    I've seen a few of Martin Mc Donagh's Irish films and they have been pretty good and raw. I didn't know Seven Psychopaths was his film until I started to watch it. Surprisingly, I didn't think it was one of Farrell's best attributes - he plays an alcoholic, which in fairness, most binge-drinking Irish person is, one of which Farrell in his personal life is supposed to be or have been - but it didn't come across well in the film. I was a bit disappointed by how he woke up and was fresher than the average person, after a supposed night of drinking wine, which gives you horrors beyond belief. I know he is supposed to be an Irish writer, living in Hollywood, but that can not take away from the horrors that you feel after a night of drinking to excess. Where were the demons? Where was the rawness? I don't feel that Farrell delved deep enough into himself, or his experiences enough, to do the character justice in those scenes. It's almost like he was an actor who had never drank - or an actor who was afraid of delving into his past. Christopher Walken was great in my mind. Not over the top, but just simple, clean, and what was expected of him. Woody Harrelson was OK too, he lacked a little bit, but wasn't too bad. It may be that these guys didn't gel enough in real life together, and should think about method acting a little more. (Study Daniel Day Lewis's films) Or, they thought so much of themselves individually. Or it was just bad editing - not in all parts, but in some. I don't know, it's only my humble opinion. The story, the plot, was amazing, and it could have been one of the most memorable films ever. The plot was original to an extent, and had so much potential. It got a bit Hollywood, which was great, and where it was supposed to go. But, in the earlier parts, before the desert, sometimes there was, I don't know, maybe actors who were too aware of the cameras? Martin Mc Donagh, great film, but lost its rawness and edginess that you do so well. Makes me think that you didn't have as much input to the final outcome in the film as maybe you wanted to.

  • sarah liddell | October 14, 2012 12:06 PMReply

    So some critics are "lazily" comparing it to Tarantino, says Jagernauth, right before he compares it to Tarantino, without ever finding a more apt or intelligent comparison himself. What a "spastic" and badly written review this was!

  • Johnson | October 14, 2012 9:17 AMReply

    agree.

  • julianna | October 10, 2012 8:25 PMReply

    I wish to share my testimonies with the general public about what this man called this awesome review.

  • Andy Sowers | October 7, 2012 8:34 PMReply

    lovely review.

  • Collin Reynolds | October 2, 2012 12:32 PMReply

    Saw the premiere in Westwood last night. I enjoyed the movie and would have sat there for another hour watching these characters. So I really do diagree with Mr. Jagernauth on every point except for the bit about this being Rockwell's film. It is his and he really holds the scattered chaos that is going through his alcoholic buddie's mind.
    "In Bruges" mirrored the collective temperment of its setting and "Seven Psychopaths" does the same. This film will be a cult classic on par with a Tarantino version of "Big Lebowski". This film is all about dialogue under the most absurd of conditions. Loved it!

  • jenia | September 24, 2012 5:10 AMReply

    My wife and I separated Last year September; sucks to be me.

  • Stella | September 14, 2012 8:16 PMReply

    Hmm, I dunno about that. I saw "The Lieutenant of Inishmore" a few years back and while that was a rather unhinged story, it was hugely enjoyable. Then again, I don't watch many stage productions of anything, usually, and wouldn't know what to look for. I just like McDonagh's writing.

  • lizzy | September 10, 2012 9:45 PMReply

    great review.

  • juliet | September 10, 2012 9:44 PMReply

    I'm so happy that I found this great man, Dr sabon. I had some bad things going on and my man left me and I was working, but I had a reading and Dr sabon told me to quit the job and that there is some unexpected shady dealing's there.. I'm glad I listened to him, because later a few weeks everyone at my job got into some legal mess and I am not part of it since I quit my job. I got a Come To Me Spell and 2 weeks later my man returned and we've been talking and got back together 2 weeks after that..." if you have any problem you can contact him via this email [redacted]. juliet

  • Travis | September 8, 2012 1:55 PMReply

    So essentially it is Quentin Tarantino's "Adaptation."?

  • Christian | September 8, 2012 11:50 AMReply

    I'm still very excited to see it. Also, another review I just saw was raving, so maybe it's going to get a bit of a mixed-positive reception anyway?

  • AS | September 8, 2012 11:06 AMReply

    "a less witty, more broad sense of humor" - This is exactly the sense I got from the trailer. I'll wait for the blu ray.

  • Taylor | September 8, 2012 10:49 AMReply

    The trailer did look pretty "meh".

Email Updates