Review: 'Only God Forgives'
5 Doomed Romance Leonardo DiCaprio Movi ...
Wes Anderson's 5 Best Commercials
Can 'World War Z' Break Even?
Steve Soderbergh On Cinema, Studios, Mor ...
Recap: 'The King Of Comedy' 30th Anniversary ...
Excl: Lake Bell Joins 'Million Dollar Ar ...
10 Essential Cinematic AntiheroesPlans for a biopic have been in the works for a couple of years now, and Mickey Rourke had been expected to take on the role of Thomas. Rourke’s first run-in with the sport was when he met some Huddersfield Giants players in a bar in London (the players were subsequently fined by the club for their behavior on said night), and when he heard of Thomas’ story he was fascinated and keen to play him in the mooted movie. Concerns have regularly been raised about the 59 year-old Rourke’s ability to convince as the rugby player – who is only now 37 – but the actor has reportedly been training hard, and even undertaken surgery to more closely resemble Thomas.
Well, today the story got rather confusing, with The Sun originally reporting that Rourke was set to be replaced by Tom Hardy. They quoted Rourke as saying: “the physical thing is harder than I thought, I’m just trying to get fit enough to do it.” Thomas reportedly added: “We’re now talking to other big-name actors who could play the part instead. We had talked about using computer-generated special effects with Mickey but we don’t think that will be as realistic, so it’s time to find someone new.” Suggestions were that that "someone new" would be Tom Hardy (which would be a fantastic improvement), but now The Sun have pulled the article from their website (though Dark Horizons still has the quotes).
The story that has replaced it claims that Rourke is in fact still on board despite Thomas admitting to talking to other actors. The new quote from Gareth Thomas reads: “I teamed up with Mickey because there’s nobody better to take on such a challenging role and nothing has changed.” So, business as usual then? We’re not convinced. Our eyebrows have been raised ever since Rourke first became interested in the role, and Tom Hardy seems to us like a much better pick. Perhaps the inclusion of Hardy’s name on the original piece led to the story being pulled, so maybe he won’t be replacing Rourke, but that’s not to say someone else won’t before filming gets underway in September.
Why 'Star Trek Into Darkness' Suggests J.J. Abrams Needs To Leave His Mystery Box Alone For A While
3 Comments
rollo tomasi | March 28, 2012 10:36 PM
it's actually just been anounced that mickey will star in a remake of the elephant man,no makeup needed
Kim | March 28, 2012 12:32 PM
Wasn't there talk of Rourke getting teeth removed to play this role? That weirded me out.
Ben | March 28, 2012 12:27 PM
Tom Hardy would be a vast improvement. Jason Statham would be a great choice as well. Mickey Rourke is way too old... and too weird looking (very bad plastic surgery) to play the role. What has the potential of being a very interesting movie could be ruined by Rourke in the lead role. Congrats to Rourke for backing the film, but he needs to bow out if his vision for the film is to be realized.