5 Doomed Romance Leonardo DiCaprio Movi ...
Wes Anderson's 5 Best Commercials
Can 'World War Z' Break Even?
Steve Soderbergh On Cinema, Studios, Mor ...
Recap: 'The King Of Comedy' 30th Anniversary ...
Excl: Lake Bell Joins 'Million Dollar Ar ...
10 Essential Cinematic AntiheroesA long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, we once lived without the internet, and movie reviews were things that people actually read instead of Twitter reactions. In print even. And right around the time of "Star Wars: Episode VI - Return Of The Jedi," not everyone was in love with the franchise. And one such person was John Simon, critic for the National Review. And in this great segment from "Nightline" in 1983, Roger Ebert and Gene Siskel challenge him on his position that the "Star Wars" movies are worthless.
Simon tries to make the argument that the movies are not suitable for children or adults or something, with Siskel and Ebert pointing to the fact they are simply great pieces of entertainment that find a more than receptive audience in the kids who go to see them. Siskel brings up "Spacehunter: Adventures in the Forbidden Zone" as the kind of movie trying to do what George Lucas has accomplished and failing miserably, while Simon lamely offers "Tender Mercies" as a substitute to bring your kids to. Watch dude get pwned below. [io9]
5 Comments
daniel | January 28, 2013 8:21 PM
Pwnd or no, Return of the Jedi is a truly terrible film, and the Ewoks are only the furry icing on that poocake.
concerned citizen kane | January 28, 2013 7:26 PM
can anyone explain that screenshot? who is the dude in the prosthetic alien getup?
TheoC | January 28, 2013 6:44 PM
Prescient John Simon, he's actually reviewing the prequels.
JoeS | January 28, 2013 6:05 PM
Amusing artifact. For those who don't know about John Simon, he was a notoriously "high brow" critic who hated most popular culture (not just films). I will give him this however, TENDER MERCIES was a better film than RETURN OF THE JEDI (aka THE EWOKS TAKE OVER)