Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

What Worked & What Didn't In Season One Of David Fincher & Kevin Spacey's 'House Of Cards'

Features
by Oliver Lyttelton
February 11, 2013 1:57 PM
25 Comments
  • |


What Doesn't (Always Work)

The material it gives its female characters
*Some mild spoilers* Given the quality of the performances by the series' actresses, it's a shame that it doesn't always know what to do with them. Interest in the show drops off every time we check in with Claire's goodwill-sapping non-profit organization, or her affair with photographer Adam Galloway (Ben Daniels), and her gradual realization that she wants a baby is a rather disappointing development. Zoe starts off nicely, but veers wildly between cynicism and naivety, and once she ends her affair with Frank, hardly has anything to do, excluding her romance with fellow journalist Lucas (Sebastian Arcelus), the single least interesting character on the show. And while some nuance develops in her relationship with rival Janine (an underused Constance Zimmer), it doesn't speak particularly well for the show's view of women that all the journalists we come across are, or have been, banging their subjects (and that's even without going into the disproportionate number of prostitutes on the show). Despite Kristen Connolly's strong performance, Christina doesn't get much to do beyond look doe-eyed at Peter -- hopefully it'll pay off in season two. And for the Chief of Staff to the leader of the free of the world, Sakina Jaffrey's Linda Vasquez is essentially just another of Frank's lackey, ready to betray her President at the first chance of getting her son into Stanford. *end spoilers* If we were to given one major note to the show, it would be to amp up the female characters, because for the most part, "House of Cards" feels very much a man's world.

The 4th wall asides
Arguably the biggest single carry-over from the TV series is the device, introduced in the very first shot, of Spacey's Frank Underwood addressing the camera. It's an undeniably theatrical device, originally inspired again by "Richard III" and its soliloquies, and it works reasonably well in some ways; it lets Frank make you complicit in his scheming, can be a handy expositional tool, and gives Spacey room to stretch his theatrical muscles (it's also deliciously evil and funny at times). But the trouble is that, with the added length and scope of the show, the writers quickly run out of smart ways to use it. As a result, it drops off a good deal as the show goes on, with some episodes barely utilizing it -- and when they do, it can be pretty extraneous. Furthermore, it's hurt by the broader perspective. With the series often departing from Frank's POV, it makes less sense for it to happen without other characters doing the same thing. It's not a deal breaker, but we hope that the writers are more careful about its inclusion next time around.

Product placement
We know that a degree of product placement is an economic necessity for certain shows, especially for one like "House of Cards," which doesn't have any other source of ad income. And it's possible to do it with a degree of ease and self-awareness, though probably more for comedies than dramas ("30 Rock" turned it into a running joke). But the use in "House of Cards" has to be about as egregious an example as we've seen. Dell and Apple products fill the frame, an entire (fleeting and inconsequenital) scene is set in front of an Enterprise car rental, and someone comments on the quality of the food they're eating...in a Pizza Hut. Worst of all is a scene seemingly designed entirely to showcase video games, that goes something like: "We're three votes short on the education b-- wait, is that a PS Vita?" "Yes, the reasonably priced PS Vita. I love playing all the latest PS Vita games on my PS Vita at home." Like we said, product placement is a necessary evil, but there have to be more seamless ways to intergrate it into the show.

Things sometimes go too easily for Frank
**MILD SPOILERS** However villainous your protagonist, the key to drama is in giving them obstacles to surmount, and the conflict that arises in them. But for Frank Underwood, things seem to go his way a little too often. We know that his scheme is clearly well-thought out, even when its finer details are a little fuzzy, but he's rarely backed into a corner in a way that makes for truly effective drama. The intention is clearly to make him more and more formidable, the smartest man in whatever room he walks into, but by besting Peter Ross, the President, the teachers union, and everyone in between, so easily, it can threaten to make the show uninvolving. It's the same issue that Superman's always had on screens; if he's invincible, it's hard to fear that he'll be beaten. And while Underwood isn't meant to be a wholly identifiable character, he's still our hero, and the show can't just be his plan falling into place. It's telling that some of his most dramatically potent moments come when he does start to be backed into a corner (by his wife's betrayal, by an ultimatum in the last quarter of the series), and it'd be nice to see more of that in season two, and maybe a new character to be a more formidable adversary for him to go toe-to-toe with.

The plotting can be far-fetched or contrived
**MAJOR SPOILERS** It's possible to forgive some of the turns that the show takes -- no matter how much you mistrust politicians, it's hard to believe that one could kill another and mock it up to make it look like a suicide -- because of the heightened, Shakespearean world it moves in. But there's a difference between that (although some Playlisters still found that a step too far), and complete suspension of disbelief, and too often the show falls into the latter category. It starts early on, with a plot revolving around an eye-catching monument that's caused the death of a local girl because of its resemblance to something naughty. It's kind of silly peg on which to hang an episode, but it's the way that it's blown up to be such a major issue that doesn't quite ring true. The teacher's strike is something of a bum note too -- an event like that which drags on for a month would be virtually unprecedented, and surely result in virtually career-ending reputations for both the President and Underwood, regardless of the questionable way in which it's resolved. And the way in which protestors are defused by a gift of barbecue, instantly transforming them into adoring fans, reeks of contempt for the electorate. This kind of plotting continues throughout the series, right down to the key decision of the Vice President to resign his office to run for Governor of his own state. The writers try hard to sell it, but it doesn't work, and the implausibility undoubtedly hurts the show. 

**MAJOR SPOILERS**
The pace drops off after the big twist
 One of our major concerns about the series moving forward is the absence of Peter Russo, a tragic pawn and the single most compelling character in the show so far. Fans of the original miniseries will have seen the move coming (in the BBC version, his cocaine is swapped out for poison, so this actually feels more plausible, luckily), but Stoll's performance, and the writing for the character, are so good that he'll undoubtedly be missed. In fact, the evidence is there in the last couple of episodes, which feel like codas to the major event of the season. Having the key turning point of a show occur before a season finale is actually a common device in cable drama (take the last season of "Mad Men," for instance), but with another 90 minutes of screen time to fill, without an awful lot of incident, "House of Cards" pulls off the structuring trick slightly less well. More importantly, there are the implications moving forward into season two -- will the show be lesser for the absence of Stoll? Again, the best way round it would seem to introduce a new character; a true foil for Frank Underwood, and one written with as much complexity as Peter was. Or just bring him back as a wisecracking ghost or something.

Someone get these script notes to the writers stat because quibbles and problems aside, "House of Cards" has us absolutely hooked and we cannot wait for Season 2. Hopefully it only gets better from here on out. Presuming you've seen the show, your thoughts on the series thus far?

Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    

25 Comments

  • Amanda | May 30, 2014 11:58 PMReply

    Claire wasn't trying to have a baby, she was visiting an ob/gyn to gather ammunition to blackmail her fired, pregnant employee into dropping her lawsuit. Once she knew how badly her employee needed a particular prescription, Claire cut off the employee's insurance benefits and used that as leverage to settle the case (pretty generously). There may have been a slight whiff of Claire considering it but in the end it was about 95% gamesmanship.

  • ClinicalCynic | March 1, 2014 2:35 PMReply

    Just... Poorly executed. All of the plot twists are foreseeable (except the Zoe wrap up), everyone in DC is not just dumber than Frank, but just plain DUMB. Why are all these seasoned reporters and politicos opening up and exposing their fears and weaknesses to Frank, a man who has been manipulating and screwing people over in DC for 20 years? And are Frank and Claire really the only people capable of controlling their emotions? Nope; the show doesn't work for me. I just don't buy into Frank's supremacy being built on the plot contrivance that everyone else in the world is a weak-willed, insecure moron.

  • Johnson | October 3, 2013 4:43 PMReply

    Good piece but I disagree with a few points:

    1. Robin Wright is brilliant. Her scenes are compelling. All of them.
    2. Love Frank's asides.
    3. His trip back to his alma mater was the low point of the series in my mind. It simply dragged on too long.
    4. I don't notice much of the product placement. And what I do see isn't bothersome.
    5. Re-watching the series again. Can't get enough.

    Great work.

  • Coleman | July 8, 2013 8:23 PMReply

    Between the months of June and September (vacation time) is when I catch up on movies, tv shows, books I have put off. House of Cards has been a fantastic treat, and as a former resident of DC, I am excited for the city, and crew.

    I think Frank and Claire are spectacular. Some of the plots were far fetched, but it reminds me of the show BOSS that was canceled too early on Starz.

    Kudos to Netflix!

  • Jonathan | March 23, 2013 9:42 PMReply

    "no matter how much you mistrust politicians, it's hard to believe that one could kill another and mock it up to make it look like a suicide"

    Keep enjoying that fantasy world.

  • Anna | February 12, 2013 7:00 PMReply

    Enjoyed your review very much. I wish I hadn't seen the British series first as I enjoyed that much more, maybe because more seemed to happen. Don't tell the sponsors but I don't notice product placement! I think it's just part of the background. But I must disagree with you in one respect; this is a story about Francis, so he must remain the strong focus of the story with others revolving around him. Going off of this- for example getting into other stories too much such as Claire's work situation is boring. Maybe I feel they're trying to stretch things out too much. Have they committed to a 10-year run?

  • Scott C | February 12, 2013 12:58 PMReply

    "And the way in which protestors are defused by a gift of barbecue, instantly transforming them into adoring fans, reeks of contempt for the electorate. " If I'm not mistaken, I believe the lobbyist for the Teacher's Union couldn't get the actual teachers there to the protest, filling in with Teamsters and anyone else they could get, which means that those at the protest didn't have a vested interest in it. Also, Linda Vasquez isn't just rolling over for the Stanford favor, she also sees the potential to become VP herself, if Underwood runs & wins a future Presidential race. I agree that these could be stronger, but I felt like you didn't give the full context, which strengthens these plot moves somewhat.

  • Glass | February 12, 2013 11:31 AMReply

    I seriously think you're just looking too hard for products in the things you watch. That's the only explanation for this sensitivity to seeing APPLE products (it's 2013, professionals use that shit) or a character with a soft spot for video games discussing a video game console in a moment of comic relief. Shit, I'm surprised you didn't Did you guys google 'Freddy's BBQ Joint' to see if it was a real place so you can complain about the random, blatant product placement of a rib joint Underwood frequents?

  • I seriously hope you guys ross douthat | February 12, 2013 6:21 AMReply

    I sort of feel that Fincher genuinely likes Apple products and would put 'em in for free lol.

    This was a very good series and I can't wait for another, but it brought home to me that doing a whole season in a weekend kind of sucks? Partly because it means the wait is a full year, not, say, nine months. This felt more like a first half of a season in any case.

    Kevin Spacey and Robin Wright and Corey Stoll were all brilliant. Stoll (and his PA/lover) was pretty much the only half-sympathetic character, which I guess shouldn't matter but does a bit. And I think the famous Father's Day scene was maybe a bit de trop.

  • Alex | February 12, 2013 12:25 AMReply

    One thing I found very unconvincing was the way Zoe joined in on trying to uncover Francis's plot in the last episode or two, especially since she was complicit in the plot and at least in my opinion was not merely a pawn.

  • Ryan | February 11, 2013 9:24 PMReply

    The only episode that I thought was a drag was the one where Frank goes back to his alma mater. It seemed like a transitional episode, meant to give the characters (and audience) a break from the main storylines back in Washington - like the calm before the storm. But I feel like if they wanted to make an episode like that, give us more than just "Frank had a gay relationship in college" that will presumably come back to be used against him in later seasons. I don't know, it just seemed too silly and trivial to be wasting our time with. I just as soon skip this episode of supposed "character development" and get back to the meat of the show. When the show comes out on DVD, this episode will be one of the few I probably will never rewatch.

    I also really liked that they didn't waste much time and killed Peter this season. This immediately put it ahead of Homeland, in my opinion, which would have benefited greatly by killing Brody off in Season 1. One thing that Fincher and Willimon seem to be aware of is avoiding milking obvious storylines for too long.

  • Navas | February 11, 2013 8:58 PMReply

    i didnt really mind the product placement at all. but most of the cons i tend to agree with. i cranked out the series in 2 days. and i need season 2 asap.

  • Scarlett O. | February 11, 2013 8:48 PMReply

    Kevin Spacey truly shines as Underwood. He's devious, arrogant, and deliciously believable. I agree that the character of Zoe has much more potential, as does Claire. If season 2 runs with the court case, I think we'll see Claire blossom on camera.

    Very addictive, I couldn't wait for the next episode, and watched all 13 episodes within about 4 days! Bring on season 2!

  • D Will | February 11, 2013 7:10 PMReply

    I thought the series was excellent. I was thoroughly entertained throughout the entire season. The only con is that, " I can't wait for season 2!! Hurry??!!

  • Farmerfizz | February 11, 2013 5:54 PMReply

    I thought it was excellent! (Episode 8 and the Military School beside.) Spacey was just the right side of pantomine villain, aided and abetted by a fantastic supporting cast. My only critique is why Claire would want an affair with the campest man this side of Christmas? Netflix take a bow for a job well done.

  • Andrew | February 11, 2013 5:34 PMReply

    Pretty spot on pros and cons list. Although I actually like the Richard III, talking to the audience device. It's been used before, sure, but when they let Kevin Spacey give a little smirk or look to the camera, those are some of my favorite moments.

  • Dave | February 11, 2013 4:07 PMReply

    Loving the series so far - up to Ep. 4 - #5 tonight. Questions:
    - Why was Zoe drinking Long Island Ice teas alone? Should've brought in some frat bro to try to hit on her, eventually forcing her departure from bar. That would've made her connection to Frank seem stronger.
    - I noticed Ep 4 didn't have a short scene before the intro - hoping that's the same throughout.
    - What did Francis think was wrong with Zoe's apt? Looked clean enough for a single reporter type. :-)

  • Ugh | February 11, 2013 3:58 PMReply

    The product placement was really the only thing that got to me. There was literally a scene where Frank Underwood & his aide were sitting at a table drinking coffee & they had 9 different Apple products - all on using up battery & with the Apple logo prominently displayed - sitting on the table.

  • Jean Robie | February 11, 2013 3:33 PMReply

    The thing I didn't like about it, especially compared to the British version, is Frank's actions (apart from what he does to poor Peter) aren't especially villainous: he just seems like a conniving politician. The pleasure of seeing him act in truly evil ways was lost. And man, what was the point of that episode at the military school!!??

  • Mass | February 11, 2013 2:24 PMReply

    What's wrong with the product placement? TV/film imitates real life, and in real life people play video games and PS Vitas.

    House of Cards is absolutely awesome and very addicting. Now that Breaking Bad is on its way out, at least I know I can go to House of Cards.

  • mongoosecmr | February 11, 2013 2:31 PM

    I'm sure Sony would love to live in the world you so where people own PS Vitas

  • Mass | February 11, 2013 2:24 PMReply

    What's wrong with the product placement? TV/film imitates real life, and in real life people play video games and PS Vitas.

    House of Cards is absolutely awesome and very addicting. Now that Breaking Bad is on its way out, at least I know I can go to House of Cards.

  • hank | February 11, 2013 2:14 PMReply

    the only thing I truly detested about the series was the uninspired, HDR timelapse credit sequence I was tortured with every time I started a new episode.

  • Karen | February 18, 2013 12:23 AM

    Those of us who live inWashington absolutely love those opening credits. Most movies about DC use the same tired location shots. They've found fresh angles, views that Washington natives know and then some - like the shot of the Nationals ballpark as seen across the river.


    . They have captured capture views of Washington that the natives know and then some

  • Glass | February 12, 2013 11:17 AM

    Yeah I was taken aback by how mediocre those were. Get someone from HBO Sports to shoot that in the future.

Email Updates