- By Oliver Lyttelton
- |
- December 9, 2011 8:54 PM
- |
- 3 Comments
As essentially a self-financing entity, Marvel has, perhaps understandably, been careful to look after the bottom line on their self-produced movies since "Iron Man." The movies have, without exception, cost north of $100 million, but the studio has been careful to keep the money on the screen, signing relative unknowns like Chris Hemsworth, character actors like Mark Ruffalo, or rising stars like Jeremy Renner. People who won't break the bank, exactly. And those actors are kept to restrictive multiple film contracts, to the extent that Chris Evans nearly backed out of "Captain America: The First Avenger."
Recent Comments
Speak for yourself. I'm a fanboy who complained about her casting. Because she look "way
what Darj said...
I totally agree with you!! The "author" even mentioned The Hunger Games movie finally.
For me, Up and Wall-E have become rather overrated. Both fine films, but very conventional after
This "article" is ridiculous in comparing Spider-Man to those other movies, esbecially
For a guy who hates Pixar so much. You sure do write about them a lot.
1. Toy Story - How could it not be top? Just a brilliant, charming, inventive, complete movie 2. Toy
Pretty Decent List.
Hammer just became my new favorite person lol, what a great answer.
So.... the studio quickly announces plans for TWO more movies and don't bother to lock in their