- By Kevin Jagernauth
- |
- January 18, 2011 1:38 AM
- |
- 2 Comments
When we first saw Danny Boyle’s survival tale “127 Hours” at TIFF, we called it “Lean, efficient, despairing, thrilling and ultimately life affirming” as well as one of the best films of the year. By now you know the film is the true story of Aron Ralston (James Franco) who was stuck in a Utah canyon for days after his arm became trapped under a boulder. Little did we know at the time that the film’s leanness was partially the result of a major trim to the third act of the film. The film’s writer Simon Beaufoy recently spoke with the NYTimes about this last minute alteration. “We had a much more resolved ending, so they [the audience] had an emotional connection. There’s a long scene with his mother in the hospital, there’s a long scene with the ex-girlfriend where she told him a few hard truths, there was a scene at his sister’s wedding, which he referenced in the movie. So we had this very unusual movie, and we resolved it in this very Hollywood way.”
Recent Comments
Since you maintain that MOS introduced the terraforming as an ELE (rightfully so), I would love
Get full album for free here: zippyshare.com/v/54354406/file.html
I think those who appreciate the compassionate spirit and/or know the humbling history of
Yeah, I found that comparison to Django to be particularly clueless & I haven't even seen
VKATNYTE, So are you just gonna bitch out everyone who doesn't agree with you? You are about as
I'd really appreciate it if those of you who haven't seen the film would please not
I listened to this podcast - in double time - so I missed this part: "the film is 75 per cent
No one is bothered because it makes sense to this film. Obviously it would've been out of place
Lois had her part to play in the film and that is all..they didnt over or under use her-also
HaHa... Finally someone knows wtf they are talking about on here...