-
Three Weddings Before a Bunch of Funerals: ... -
Cannes: Asghar Farhadi Talks Fest Favorite ... -
MacFarlane Opts Out of 2014 Oscar Gig, Recommends ... -
Cannes First Look: Paul Haggis Talks 'Third ... -
Cannes Review: 'Inside Llewyn Davis' Is Vintage ...
-
Arthouse Audit: 'Frances Ha' Debuts Strong ... -
Weekend Box Office Top Ten Is Strong, Led ... -
ACLU to 'Modern Family': Let Cam and Mitch ... -
Cannes: Coens Make A Splash with 'Inside ... -
Cannes Fest Diary 2: Dull Coppola, Brilliant ...
-
Cannes Interview: David Lowery Talks 'Ain't ... -
Harvey Weinstein Previews Awards Slate at ... -
Talking 'Star Trek Into Darkness' VFX -
Variety Takes a Hatchet To Warner Bros. Movie ... -
Weinstein Co. Green Lights 'Crouching Tiger ...
Cannes Virgin Festival Diary 1: From 'Gatsby' ...
Cannes Exclusive! Jim Mickle Talks Smart ...
Cannes Review: Coppola's 'The Bling Ring ...
Cannes Interview: Ryan Coogler Talks Honoring ...
'Frances Ha' Q & A: Greta Gerwig, Noah Baumbach ...
How 'Iron Man 3' and 'Django Unchained' Played ...
Bradley Cooper Is New Model Smart Star
Q & A: How Willimon Runs Fincher's 'House ...Anatomy of A High-Brow Art Debate: Sean Penn and the Bitch-Slapping of Malick's Tree of Life
It goes like this. Sean Penn talks to Le Figaro and implies (Exhibit A) Terrence Malick underutilized him in The Tree of Life. The New Yorker's Richard Brody defends Malick and upholds the idea that actors are the equivalent of colors on a painter's brush ("Penn brings an acid yellow to the glass-and-metal grays of his scenes, and it adds something important to the film"), and that Penn's lack of understanding of his own performance doesn't undermine the power or purpose of it. InContention's Kris Tapley calls Penn's comments a bitch-slap, and while he doesn't exactly disagree ("The bookend nature of his role is the weaker element of the film"), he does imply that Penn is being a bit of a diva in the midst of Malick's well-known experimental and unpredictable directing style (both Javier Bardem and Jessica Chastain told TOH! they weren't even sure if they'll appear in Malick's latest project, though both were thrilled to work with him).
Commentators--official (Exhibit B) and unofficial (Exhibits C and D)--will now argue on the side of the actor or director, on the variable size of their egos, the hopes and intentions of each as artists, and so on.
Exhibit A: "I didn’t at all find on the screen the emotion of the script, which is the most magnificent one that I’ve ever read. A clearer and more conventional narrative would have helped the film without, in my opinion, lessening its beauty and its impact. Frankly, I’m still trying to figure out what I’m doing there and what I was supposed to add in that context! What’s more, Terry himself never managed to explain it to me clearly."Exhibit B: LATimes: "Whether Penn's riposte comes off as honest or sour grapes probably turns on whether you feel The Tree of Life is a masterpiece or a naked emperor, a subject about which there's been no obvious consensus."
Exhibit C: Comment at The New Yorker: "The Tree of Life it's not as good as everybody wants it to be."
Exhibit D: Comment at InContention: "To me it isn’t about agreeing or disagreeing with his sentiments. No, its about the fact that Penn is an ass."
ThePlaylist reminds us that selective quoting is often the instigator with these debates.
2 Comments
star jonestown | August 22, 2011 7:04 AM
Now that Sean Penn has directed a great movie, he has additional license to comment.
His comments are on the nose.
#slownewsday
Ken | August 22, 2011 6:35 AM
This is a bit silly. I find it *really* hard to believe that a guy who worked on The Thin Red Line would at all be surprised that the final film deviates from the script or that acting performances were cut short. If there's any film in the history of Hollywood most known for that kind of deviation, it is The Thin Red Line.
So is it sour grapes from Penn or perhaps a quote taken slightly out of context?