The New Year Starts Off Well for Benedict Cumberbatch

Television
by Anne Thompson and Beth Hanna
January 2, 2014 12:18 PM
2 Comments
  • |
Benedict Cumberbatch and Martin Freeman in "Sherlock" Season 3

While it seemed that Benedict Cumberbatch was everywhere in 2013, from baddie Khan in "Star Trek" and dragon Smaug in the latest "Hobbit" installment, several of his films suffered some disappointing returns at the box office, most notably his only headliner "The Fifth Estate," where he played WikiLeaks badboy Julian Assange. But the new year is off to a good start for the Brit actor, whose "Sherlock" third season premiere nabbed the highest-ever UK ratings upon its return to the BBC. (We have to wait for our Cumberbatch fix until January 19 on PBS Masterpiece, when "Sherlock" plays back-to-back with "Downton Abbey.")

The New Year's Day episode, titled "The Empty Hearse," had 9.2 million UK viewers tune in. This beats out the Season 2 opener by almost half a million. The third season's return had also had quite the build-up going for it: The series has been on hiatus for almost two years, no doubt partially to accommodate Cumberbatch's busy filming schedule ("12 Years a Slave" and "August: Osage County" rounded out his five films of 2013).

Now, Cumberbatch (like his "Hobbit" and "Sherlock" co-star Martin Freeman) is clearly a bigger star in the UK than in the states, where he has yet to catch on in a headlining way. At 37 he's an actor on the swift rise who is undoubtedly popular. He is still one of many great actors, from Tom Hardy and Joel Edgerton to Jason Clarke, who have yet to prove themselves as marquee draws. After all, that is the definition of movie star: someone who can actually open a movie and earn their millions by putting butts in seats.

As with past seasons, the third season of "Sherlock" has three episodes. Check out the trailer for the second episode, below. 

You might also like:

2 Comments

  • helen | January 2, 2014 7:25 PMReply

    As The Desolation of Smaug and Star Trek into Darkness did good business and 12 Years a Slave did fine for a small speciality movie I'm not sure how you can say "several of his films suffered some disappointing returns at the box office" Yes we know about The Fifth Estate but I don't know how you can spin this story based on specialist/limited release films like 12 Years a Slave and August Osage County. Plus you have the fact that he only has tiny cameos in those two films. Talk about stretching a point. I used to think Thompson on Hollywood was worth reading but clearly not.

  • Shavonne | January 3, 2014 9:09 PM

    I agree. Thompson you are way off on this one. There are a number of films that will be Oscar contenders that didn't exactly set the box office alight with huge returns and you choose to focus on the one film that really didn't do well and say that "several" of Cumberbatch's features were disappointing??? The Hobbit: Desolation of Smaug and Star Trek Into Darkness have grossed a combined total of over $800 million dollars box office due in no small part to Cumberbatch's fine efforts. You need to get a clue. Seriously.

Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    

Email Updates

Most "Liked"

  • LISTEN: On KCRW's The Treatment, Mindy ...
  • Brad Pitt to Star in David Michôd's ...
  • Arthouse Audit: 'Only Lovers Left Alive' ...
  • Fox's Jim Gianopulos to Deliver USC ...
  • Pulitzer Prize Winners Unveiled
  • The Highs and Lows of the Meaningless ...
  • Watch: Highlights from Seth Rogen's ...
  • Box Office Top Ten: 'Captain America' ...
  • Career Watch: As 'Mad Men' Enters Its ...
  • Brie Larson Goes Into the 'Room,' Lenny ...