Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

Arthouse Audit: 'Bling Ring' Continues Strong Specialized Openings; 'Before Midnight' Disappoints in Expansion

Box Office
by Tom Brueggemann
June 16, 2013 4:29 PM
4 Comments
  • |

"Call Me Kuchu"
Also opening:

Cinedigm's "Call Me Kuchu," documenting the potential life and death struggle of gays in Uganda, did $3,200 in one New York theater. "Pandora's Promise" (Abramorama), a Sundance 2013 doc mostly positive about nuclear energy, took in $20,421 in 16 theaters. "More Than Honey" (Kino Lorber) took in $7,700 in five days at New York's Film Forum. "So Young" (China Lion), a massive smash at home, did only $5,000 in 3 theaters.

Festival acclaimed films "In the Fog" (Strand), "Aliyah" (Film Movement) and "Berberian Sound Studio" (IFC, also on Video on Demand) have not yet had grosses reported.

Ongoing/ expanding

The major event of the weekend was the significant national break of Richard Linklater's "Before Midnight" (Sony Pictures Classics) in its third week. Playing at 897 theaters, the best-reviewed film of 2013 reported a gross of only $1,526,000, for a per screen average of $1,701.

Playing in a release pattern similar (91 more theaters) to Woody Allen's "To Rome With Love" exactly a year ago, it grossed less than half as much (Allen's film ended up just under $17 million). The PSA is half of what "The Place Beyond the Pines" achieved on 600 more screenings (with PSAs harder to maintain with more theaters), and likewise about half of "Mud" in its third weekend at 852 theaters. Both those films headed toward $20 million+ grosses because their initial grosses when opened wide -- in both cases with somewhat less competition for screens -- were able to sustain lengthy runs that amassed their ultimate grosses, which now seems unlikely for "Midnight." 

Whatever the reasons for SPC to move so quickly, the film is unlikely to sustain a long run (the most recent entry in the series, "Before Sunset," played steadily for three months on its way to a nearly $6 million gross). "Before Midnight," with a more concentrated national advertising campaign, has likely seen its high water mark unless the modest sampling of the film leads to great word of mouth to allow it to plateau at this unimpressive level.

This is significant because the trend from most of the studio-related distributors (initially an innovation from Weinstein's Miramax days) is to get any limited film with potential out wide as quickly as possible. It increases gross totals, awareness (which can help in DVD and cable sales as well as foreign interest, and positions films better for awards). But it can come at a cost -- limiting a film's potential at core specialized theaters, and more importantly not allowing a film of the terrific quality of "Before Midnight" to find its own level and thrive where it will have the greatest response. 

It's possible that "Midnight" might still hold well enough to look better ultimately, or else its older-audience serious appeal (while it appears to look younger-oriented) just plays better with critics than audiences. But in a season with several standout releases (led by "Pines" and "Mud" and more modestly by the much more narrowly-releases "Frances Ha") these numbers are a reminder of how tricky it is to succeed even with all elements seemingly in place for a successful run.

Roadside Attractions' "Much Ado About Nothing" added 18 theaters in existing markets for a total of 23, grossing $163,000, which actually was down a bit in total for the limited first weekend in only five theaters. Next week's big city limited expansion will give a better indication of its potential.

Among third-week expansions, Fox Searchlight's "The East" continues to show modest strength, grossing $285,000 in 115 theaters (+74), for a PSA just under $2,500 and a total of $706,000. The new openings are at a relative level a bit above the film's performance to this point, suggesting it is reaching the intended younger audience better now. It is performing better than CBS Films' "The Kings of Summer" whose third weekend did $142,000 in fewer (63) theaters (+19), with a lower PSA of $2,254 and total of $534,000.

Two other recent releases continued to do well on their relative scales. IFC's "Frances Ha" -- another film that has an accelerated wider release -- added another $321,000 in 213 screens (-20) for a PSA of $1,507 and total of $2.9 million. SPC's Israeli "Fill the Void" continues its very slow rollout, doing $87,000 in 5 theaters (PSA $4,844, total, with a long way to go, of $390,000).

Box Office
  • |

More: Box Office, Box Office, Box Office

4 Comments

  • Greg | June 19, 2013 8:24 PMReply

    Why don't you put some REAL news here on Indiewire and stop suppressing the truth about festivals and Sundance, and tell us FILMMAKERS who have spent our hard earned dollars and time wanting to become Independent Filmmakers, let us know how we are all being dupped, and how Sundance Awards its own films made at Sundance Institution for years now, 6 programmers and 12,000 films, a law suit filed because Sundance doesn't watch any of the films and the courts ruled in its favour, they don't have to prove that they watch even 30 seconds!!!!! There are many more lawsuits coningthis year and yet you people bury the evidence because they spend money on your site for advertising.
    What kind of scruples do you have anyways? Answer NONE! I hope everyone finds out about you Filmmaker Magazine and all you rip offs that are to corrupt to tell people the truth. A law suit ensued years ago, yet you make no mention of it?
    NOW HERE THIS EVERYONE, SUNDANCE AND INDIEWIRE ARE GOING DOWN THE TOILET WITH THE REST OF THE CORPORATIONS AND UNSCRUPULOUS ONES.
    Shame on you all. Greg

  • Well... | June 16, 2013 8:29 PMReply

    Well...I wouldn't exactly call it "art house" but I wouldn't call it a "studio picture either. There was no major studio producing or distributing.

    At the same time it had plenty of money behind it. A24 has big investors and Sofia Coppola has access to deep pockets.

    It is what it is. I don't think either label applies.

  • Ramesh | June 16, 2013 5:32 PMReply

    Bling ring is not an art house film it's a studio picture.

  • cedric | June 16, 2013 6:44 PM

    it was financed independently and acquired at rough cut stage by a24, an independent distributor. what's your qualification for art house versus independently financed?

Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    

Email Updates

Most "Liked"

  • Sony Counters Bad Press with 'Spider-Man' ...
  • PBS Preview: Six New 'Makers' Documentaries ...
  • Toronto Film Festival Global Summit ...
  • Distribution Maestro Jeff Blake Exits ...
  • Trailers From Hell Opens 'The Doors ...
  • Trailers From Hell Loves 'All That ...
  • FIRST LOOK: Toronto Best Actress Candidate ...
  • Which World Premieres Did Venice La ...
  • Parker Posey and Jamie Blackley Will ...
  • Get Tied Down With First Trailer for ...