
And Thomson often has unexpected ideas. On film noir he dismisses the conventional idea that film noir was based on the hardboiled detective literature of, in particular, Dashiell Hammett and Raymond Chandler, saying that both men were “more robust than the neurotic personality of noir,” and that there was “no real doubt in their books about the place of good and evil,” while there is a “growing uncertainty” in noir over which is which. He focuses, instead, on Patrick Hamilton whose plays included "Gaslight" (1944) and "Hangover Square" (1945).
Thomson also often directs the reader’s attention to films that have been overlooked or gone out of fashion. In a section on films about World War II, he highlights two “unforgettable” movies, Joseph Losey’s "Mr. Klein" (1976) and Robert Bresson’s "A Man Escaped" (1956). Calling Quentin Tarantino’s "Inglorious Basterds" (2009) “one of the first films that didn’t seem to understand what happened in the Second World War but took the crudest films as a matter of record,” he muses about what will happen when no one is alive who was alive during the war years and perhaps the record of the war will depend on films “as mediocre and complacent as 'The Longest Day' (1962), 'A Bridge Too Far' (1977), 'The Guns of Navarone' (1961), 'The Dirty Dozen' (1967), and 'Patton' (1970) instead of, say, 'Bitter Victory' (1957), Anthony Mann’s 'Men in War' (1957), John Boorman’s 'Hell in the Pacific' (1968) or Bertolucci’s 'The Conformist' (1970).”
Thomson gives full credit to his sources in an appendix. Word to the wise: the book doesn’t have an index on Kindle, so it is not possible to look up all references to a director or a movie.
1 Comment
Brian | January 2, 2013 11:45 AM
Thanks for this review. Always nice to see Harmetz's byline. (I remember when she was a regular contributor to The New York Times.) I want to read this book, but I tend to wait till thick books like this come out in paperback. I hope that's soon. (And no, I'm not an e-book person.)