Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

Don't Miss the New 35mm Restoration of Antonioni's 'L'Avventura,' Starting July 12 in New York and LA

News
by Beth Hanna
July 11, 2013 2:29 PM
3 Comments
  • |
Monica Vitti in Michelangelo Antonioni's "L'Avventura"

Michelangelo Antonioni’s “L’Avventura” is a film you have a lifelong relationship with. In his Great Movies review of the film, Roger Ebert wrote that it took him decades of watching and rewatching it to “realize how much clarity and passion Antonioni brought to the film’s silent cry of despair.”

This is why it’s so important to see the new 35mm restoration of “L’Avventura,” kicking off its bi-coastal run on July 12 at New York’s Film Forum and LA’s Cinefamily. If you’ve already seen the film, you will most likely see it again at some point, and if you’ve never seen it, you will probably see it several times in your lifetime once you do. And the chances to watch it or any movie on film are -- as we know -- increasingly few and far between.

The film was booed upon its premiere at Cannes in 1960. But then it won the festival’s Jury Prize, became an international box office success and was selected by Pauline Kael as the best film of the year. Over the course of a luxurious 143 minutes, the impossibly lovely Monica Vitti loses her best friend while on a boating day trip -- the woman seemingly disappears among the jutting rocks of a small island -- begins an affair with her missing friend’s boyfriend, and realizes how quickly one can become distracted and forget about important things.

The characters in the film are rich, bored and existentially hollow. “L’Avventura” suggests nothing will wake them from their emptiness, though Vitti’s character agonizes in vain over this bleak truth throughout the film’s episodic second act.

The film was Antonioni and Vitti’s first together, beginning a director-muse collaboration that would go on to include such thematically resonant entries as “La Notte,” “L’Eclisse” and “Red Desert.” Antonioni’s camera loves Vitti (every camera loves Vitti), but is careful to give the surrounding landscapes more depth and vitality than any of the living beings on screen. The Aeolian island of the film’s first sixty minutes is so hauntingly ageless -- so present -- it threatens to overshadow the rest of the picture.

I’ve now seen “L’Avventura” twice -- the second being this restoration -- and still find my stamina tested by its last hour. But apparently I’m in good company, in needing time to understand the film’s strange, ghostly journey. The anti-adventure where nothing and everything happens.

Now, thanks to these pristine prints by Janus Films, moviegoers can add a new chapter (filled with awe? perplexity? malaise? mesmerism?) to their experience of this classic masterwork.

This is the first domestic 35mm of “L’Avventura” in over a decade; the prints were struck from a restoration negative.



News
  • |

More: News, Classics, Janus, News

3 Comments

  • Joseph Angier | July 12, 2013 8:38 PMReply

    Thanks for the heads-up on this. I remember the last time I saw L'Avventura - about 15 years ago at the UCLA theater - it was preceded by a new short film by Antonioni in which he returns to the same island - in 16mm color this time. We never see him (or anyone else), but we hear him musing about the various locations he used, in a kind of 'return to the scene of the crime' style. I can't say that it added anything at all to the experience of watching his original movie ... sometimes lightning just strikes once.

  • Terry | July 11, 2013 10:57 PMReply

    Pauline Kael had absolutely nothing with the success of Antonioni's masterpiece. Her review of the film is considered the worst she ever wrote in her life about a great film. She couldn't understand what the film was about and relied on cliches like the human condition in her review. Unquestionably, the finest review of the film was, and will remain, Stanley Kauffmann's. It's one of those films that test a critic for everything she or he is worth. Kael failed miserably, and her utterly ignorant comments on the rest of Antonioni's films proves she was always out of her depth with regard to films that made ANY intellectual demands on the audience. So, see the film, and if you a good laugh, try reading Kael's pitiful attempt at reviewing this masterpiece.

  • Jay Kindervater | May 5, 2014 6:42 PM

    Kael's review is considered the worst by...Who? You? Who are you?

Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    

Email Updates

Most "Liked"

  • Elizabeth Gabler's Fox 2000 Nabs 'Hunger ...
  • WATCH: Benicio Del Toro’s Pablo Escobar ...
  • First Image from Herzog’s ‘Queen of ...
  • Martin Scorsese Stays Busy as Paramount ...
  • It's Kevin Kline vs. Maggie Smith in ...
  • Ron Howard Rocks Beatles Concert Tour ...
  • Trailers from Hell Spends 'A Night at ...
  • WATCH: Knightley, Rockwell and Moretz ...
  • WATCH: Academy Videos of 'Originals’ ...
  • Films That Popped at Karlovy Vary, from ...