AT: That one goes in your direction in terms of not telling people what to think. Very much so.
MH: It sounds like you are dismissing him.
AT: Not at all. It's a subject of great debate that the filmmaker doesn't tell the audience what to think. Therefore it inspires great numbers of conversations that otherwise wouldn't have taken place.
MH: I certainly will see the film at some point. I'm a huge fan of Philip Seymour Hoffman and very curious to see that film.
AT: Where do you stand on the subject of shooting digitally vs. shooting on film?
MH: The fact is that within a few years no one will be shooting on 35 mm film anymore. That's regrettable, but whether I regret that or not is irrelevant, because that's simply how it is. The problem however is the rapid development of technology, the non-stop development of technology. Each year there is a new camera and the latest and greatest with new possibilities. That means that none of the technicians can really master what they have, they're all constantly having to try out and test how to work with the newest cameras. And that comes to problems, so all of these technical developments and technical possibilities that have arisen with new technology really don't impress me. I find working with 35mm far more enjoyable. When a problem comes up the technician blames the cameraman and the cameraman blames technician...35 mm was a mature technology, people could master it. That's not the case anymore. People are constantly having to test things, having to learn how to work with the new tools.
AT: When have you worked in digital?
MH: We shot "Cache" on video, it was necessary to use video for the entire film. It wasn't the case for "Amour," we couldn't show it in 35 mm, but my cinematographer was so enthusiastic about working with this new digital camera [the Arri Alexa] that I allowed myself to be convinced by him and I have to say I very much regret that decision, because that decision led me to having to spend a year in different studios working in post-production to make corrections.
AT: I had no idea, it doesn't show. It's beautiful.
MH: I've never had so much work shooting a film.
AT: Will you shoot in 35 for your next film?
MH: I hope so, it depends for the theme.
AT: Do you know what you're doing next, do you have that planned?
MH: My next project is in opera.
AT: Is this Mozart's 'Cosi Fan Tutte' in Madrid?
MH: Madrid and Brussels.
AT: Thank you very much.
MH: Thank you.
4 Comments
rgm | January 10, 2013 4:00 PM
Excellent and, now, very timely interview
Lisa Nesselson | December 21, 2012 6:47 PM
I'm under the impression that the changes requiring that the awards be spread around date back to Polanski's Cannes jury giving so many prizes to "Barton Fink."
From the Cannes web site:
>
In 1991, "Barton Fink" won the Palme d'Or, Best Director and Best Actor.
Tyrannosaurus Max | December 4, 2012 4:09 PM
GREAT interview. Thanks for this.