Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

Oscar Coverage Round-Up

by Sophia Savage
March 5, 2010 8:39 AM
2 Comments
  • |
Thompson on Hollywood

IndieWIRE's Sophia Savage culls the best of the Award coverage leading up to the Big Show Sunday night:

While some are giddy for Oscar night, others are rolling their eyes at all the hoopla. Vanity Fair interviewed Terry Gilliam (Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus) before the nominees were announced. His point-of-view on the whole affair puts a wet blanket on all the excitement. Does he value the Oscars? No: “It’s somewhat useful to get money a bit easier for your next movie. But that’s about it. It’s too many people that I’ve admired over the years who never got one. I don’t know what it represents anymore. It’s become too much of this controlled ritual.”

The NYT’s Melena Ryzik comments that ten best picture nominees have made the race less about being the number one favorite of some and more about the possibilities within a variable ranking system. She argues that we have already experienced a lead-up to Oscar night “with as much narrative sweep as a made-for-television mini-series,” and what audiences really want from the Oscar show is what they want from a good movie: escapism. In another story, Janet Roberts makes well-reasoned arguments on behalf of Bigelow, Bridges, Bullock, Waltz and Mo’Nique, yet remains murky on Best Picture: because of their prior wins, front-runners are Avatar, The Hurt Locker, Up In The Air, and Inglorious Basterds.

USA Today talks Oscar drama and points out that with ten nominees, "the Academy unleashed twice as many lobbyists needing half as many votes to win."

Thompson on Hollywood
Would predicting be easier if the playing field wasn’t five players too crowded? Clarity aside, many Oscar observers see the ludicrousness of ten. New York Magazine’s David Edelstein calls the five additional nominees “fake-outs.” Have they just been there to confuse us and bask in what they probably know to be false honor? There are also more presenters this year, nearly 70, Steve Pond reports. So the Oscar spotlight is being spread around more than ever.

The Hurt Locker producer Nicolas Chartier has managed to steal the pre-Oscar spotlight. The LAT posted email correspondence between Chartier and a lawyer for Sergeant Jeffrey Sarver, who has filed a lawsuit against The Hurt Locker. Chartier was apparently unaware of Sarver and what he might have to complain about regarding the film. The Daily Beast's Nicole LaPorte reveals that Chartier, who was banned from Bigelow’s set long before he was banned from the Oscars, still has support: “Support Nicolas Chartier” was born on Facebook a few days ago, and is up to 134 members as of 1:12pm today.

To help Oscar-watchers win their office pool, HitFix highlights the favorites in each of the shorts categories.

In Contention’s Guy Lodge (remember, he's a Brit) argues for dark-horse nominee Janet Patterson, who designed the costumes for Jane Campion's Bright Star, "one of 2009’s most immaculately integrated – and under-rewarded – technical ensembles.” The nomination will hopefully draw more viewers to this meticulously detailed, understated film.

Many Oscar nominees have more on their schedules to juggle than the Oscar show itself. Donna Freydkin focuses on Precious best director nominee Lee Daniels’ non-stop schedule before he arrives Sunday at the Kodak Theatre, including Friday nights's Indie Spirit Awards, hosted by “action transvestive” Eddie Izzard.

In advance of a weekend of fab Oscar parties, USA Today offers tips on how to throw your own. Here's MTV’s annual Oscar spoof. What do we want on Sunday night? To be entertained--and surprised.

2 Comments

  • Baxter T. Coolridge Jr. | March 7, 2010 12:44 AMReply

    Terry Gilliam has long ago deserved an Oscar. I don't know what the Oscars mean anymore when so often true genius is over looked. You all know the list.
    By the way, please embrace the whole feeling of the Vanity Fair piece before you just pull this FOX news like sensationalism. This kind of journalism is as bad as a movie trailer that completely misses the theme of a movie for the sake of sexing things up.

  • JohnDoe | March 6, 2010 4:58 AMReply

    I think I'm going to have to agree with Mr. Gilliam. People seem to get so worked up about the Oscars these days, and for what? Its fun to watch the hosts sometimes, and see who shows up wearing what crazy outfit, but other than that, I don't really care who wins anymore. It's all politics unfortunately. Just Hollywood patting themselves on the back once again. It seems like in the past few years, the Oscars have become so predictable to the point where no one watches on Oscar night because they know what's going to happen. Just look at the ratings lately. No doubt the show will get a huge boost this year due to the 10 picture race, and Avatar's nomination, but let's face it, it's not going to beat The Hurt Locker. Many people watching will be left scratching their heads at the end of the night because they haven't seen THL. It's only going to turn-off people from watching again.

    P.S.- I liked The Hurt Locker a lot, great movie. Also loved Avatar, Inglourious Basterds, District 9, and Up.

Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    

Email Updates

Most "Liked"

  • Career Watch: Will 'Hit Girl' Chloe ...
  • Trailers From Hell on 'Requiem For A ...
  • Rolling Stone Names 40 Greatest Rock ...
  • Best of the Week: Remembering Robin ...
  • WATCH: Four Clips from Amos Gitai's ...
  • SPECIALTY BOX OFFICE: 'Trip to Italy' ...
  • Emmy Watch: Flying Under Awards Radar, ...
  • WATCH: Provocative 'Men, Women & Children' ...
  • Jason Reitman's 'Men, Women & Children' ...
  • New York Film Festival Unveils Auteur-Packed ...