Paramount Wants Chris Pine for Jack Ryan

by Anne Thompson
October 19, 2009 11:18 AM
3 Comments
  • |

Thompson on Hollywood
Last summer, as producer Lorenzo Di Bonaventura was waiting to read the new Untitled Tom Clancy Project from writer Hossein Amini, he told me that the Jack Ryan role could go older, or younger. Well, now that the studio is in deep negotiations with Star Trek star Chris Pine, they're obviously going younger. It makes sense. If the studio has an in-house star (lined up to do the Star Trek sequel), they might as well hang onto him by offering him another juicy franchise role. It amazes me that in the franchise era, it has taken the studio this long to ramp this one up.

How does Pine fit in with the other Jack Ryans? Alec Baldwin played the young Ryan in my favorite film of the series, 1990's The Hunt for Red October. When he fell out over the deal (in one of the great career miscalls in Hollywood history), Harrison Ford took over as an older Ryan in Patriot Games and Clear and Present Danger. Ben Affleck went younger again in 2002's The Sum of All Fears. What's great about Pine is that unlike many American male stars these days, he's masculine, athletic, dangerous--and a good actor to boot. He'll do fine.

At one point Paramount was developing an alternative Clancy series, starting with the 1993 novel Without Remorse, a Vietnam era thriller that doesn't feature Ryan (he makes a brief appearance, as does his father) but explores the character of the young John Clark/John Kelly played by Willem Dafoe in Clear and Present Danger. (Superman Returns star Brandon Routh was briefly mentioned for the CIA operative, while Clancy told Premiere in 2001 he preferred Matt Damon.) The studio announced John Singleton as director, but the movie never got anywhere. Another Clancy novel featuring Clark/Kelly, Rainbow Six, never got off the ground, even with Zack Snyder attached to write and direct.

Here's the Jack Ryan Special Edition DVD Collection.

You might also like:

3 Comments

  • Bob Westal | October 20, 2009 10:17 AMReply

    Yes, the persistent threat of total nuclear annihilation was a scream. Terrorism really is kid-stuff next to the Cold War, when you actually think about it, but most people then and now didn't think about it. Terrorism, because it's more understandable to most people, seems scarier -- but it's not.

  • Joe Valdez | October 20, 2009 6:46 AMReply

    I think the only way Jack Ryan is going to work again is to set the film during the Cold War. I don't see how the CIA could possibly come off as anything other than the Gang Who Couldn't Shoot Straight in this day and age.

    The best results you're going to get with a contemporary, anti-terrorist approach is something like The Kingdom: pretty good script, top notch cast, energetic director. And audiences could have cared less.

    The Hunt For Red October is one of the greatest adventure movies of all time. It was fun. Nothing about the Middle East or Islamic extremism is fun.

  • ag | October 20, 2009 1:08 AMReply

    i look into my crystal ball and see that, not only will pine rock as ryan, but there will be three new ryan movies (all with pine) that form a trilogy a la bourne. what will give the pine/ryan as much (or maybe a bit more) traction than damon/bourne is ryan will be combating terrorism, which is a tad more up front in audience's minds as opposed to the soul-searching of bourne.

Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    

Email Updates

Most "Liked"

  • LISTEN: On KCRW's The Treatment, Mindy ...
  • Brad Pitt to Star in David Michôd's ...
  • Arthouse Audit: 'Only Lovers Left Alive' ...
  • Fox's Jim Gianopulos to Deliver USC ...
  • Pulitzer Prize Winners Unveiled
  • The Highs and Lows of the Meaningless ...
  • Watch: Highlights from Seth Rogen's ...
  • Box Office Top Ten: 'Captain America' ...
  • Career Watch: As 'Mad Men' Enters Its ...
  • WATCH: Guillermo Arriaga's Anthology ...