Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

Review: Adaptation 'Winter's Tale' Is Ruined by Writer-Director Akiva Goldsman

Reviews
by John Anderson
February 14, 2014 3:16 PM
6 Comments
  • |
'Winter's Tale'
'Winter's Tale'

That thud you just heard was “Winter’s Tale” landing in the theaters today, and poised to become a touchstone in the history of misbegotten literary adaptations. 

It’s been 30 years since Mark Helprin published his enchanting and enchanted novel about time travel, Old New York, beautiful consumptives, a gang called the Short Tails, and a Marc Chagall-meets-steam-punk aesthetic. But given what Akiva Goldsman  has chosen to do with it, well, there was really no hurry.

The veteran screenwriter ("The Da Vinci Code"), making his feature directorial debut, apparently thought what Helprin’s magic-realist novel needed was less magic. This he has provided. The baroque construction of the novel is lost, the emotional resonance of the language is abandoned, the things that seemed charmed in the book now seem juvenile, especially since they’re given no room to breathe or live. The movie isn’t just inert, it seems silly. Which is probably why Helprin, off in Virginia or wherever he’s holed up, declined to do any press.

Cast as Helprin’s Ellis Island orphan Peter Lake – set adrift by his ill, refugee parents (who, according to the author, in a  1983 interview, died when their boat caught fire en route back to Europe), and raised by bogmen on the marshes of Bayonne, N.J. -- is Colin Farrell. A really likable actor, he may simply be too intelligent to be a movie star; he can’t sell Goldsman’s dialogue, because he can’t possibly buy it himself. Peter would seem like a great character – a thief, a fugitive, living in the vaulted ceiling of Grand Central Terminal, and befriended by a flying white horse (think of the Tristar logo). But even a great character needs adequate storytelling.

Conversely, Russell Crowe, like a belch in church, always manages to get your attention. He is appropriately grotesque as Pearly Soames, the gangster of New York who wants Peter dead and is willing to live a hundred years to get him. He also, as it happens, is in league with Lucifer (Will Smith). Why does Pearly want Peter thrown off the Brooklyn Bridge? Who knows? Despite the two-hour running time of the film, the fabric of the novel is in tatters by the time Goldsman gets done with it, and one gets the sense no one was really serious: Smith’s appearance, and Crowe’s too, seem to be less about drama than the fact that they starred in Goldsman’s more successful films (“A Beautiful Mind,” “I Am Legend” among them). Maybe he thought that, like magic, some luck would rub off.

Escaping more or less unscathed is Jessica Brown Findlay, last seen dying in “Downton Abbey” (as Lady Sarah Crawley) and dying again as Beverly Penn, flushed and feverish newspaper heiress. In a movie that can’t find a tone it likes – which is fatal for a fable -- she rises above it all gracefully. But she’d need more than flying horse to take the rest of the cast with her.

6 Comments

  • maleri | August 14, 2014 8:10 PMReply

    I thought the movie was beautiful. The symbolism was incredible and the cast amazing. I'm reading the book and I have to say I'm falling in love with it also. It's not an easy read which I feel so many people are use to and because of that it's criticized easily. It does take some time and strict attention. Which is beautiful in itself. I'm not disappointed with either form of this story. They are different but equally beautiful for different reasons.

  • corie tappin | June 20, 2014 1:47 AMReply

    I thought this movie was stunningly good and I am surprised that anyone would write such a negative review.

  • Doc Truli | February 17, 2014 10:39 PMReply

    I have not yet read the novel. That said, critics seem to have watched a different movie than I. Perhaps I just see ot in a different "light." If you are or have ever known an orphan, if you believe in good and evil, if you watch the actors' faces, how can you not conclude this movie is spectacular? Farrel and Hurt Matrix-style by the fireplace, driwning in their own private tensions. The ease with which Willa shrugs off timeless age. "You see things." Ah! There is truth in this movie. It goes in my top ten. Keep working, team. Keep working.

  • Lois Bernard | February 16, 2014 6:36 PMReply

    Can't believe that a a man so talented as Akiva Goldsman who devoted so much love and time to this movie could have left out so much of what made the book much more than magic and romance. Nevertheless it's two hours of beauty and a refreshing break from cynicism and f-bombs.

  • Kent | February 16, 2014 5:10 PMReply

    Jessica Brown Findlay played Lady Sybil Crawley, not Sarah, on "Downton Abbey."

  • Minot8 | February 15, 2014 5:08 AMReply

    I don't know when you read the "enchanting novel," but I was a victim of a book club reading of it just two months ago. The novel was tedious and incomprehensible. There were a few wonderful story lines which dribbled off into outer space somewhere. Even the person who suggested the novel for the book club because she had loved it when she first read it hated it this time around. Only one other person and I finished it, and I felt that reading it was a punishment. I had no idea how this could have been translated to the screen....first it needed to be translated into an understandable story.

    All of this is to say that you can't blame the screenwriter/ director for the horrendous movie, Mark Halpern should get most of that credit

Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    

Email Updates

Most "Liked"

  • Why Weinstein Is Re-Releasing Summer ...
  • First Gurus 'O Gold Pre-Festival Top ...
  • Emmy Watch: As TV Enters the Future, ...
  • Emmy Awards: Lena Dunham Wins the Red ...
  • The Radical World of Avant-Garde Master ...
  • Participant Joins DreamWorks' Spielberg ...
  • Trailers From Hell and Joe Dante on ...
  • EXCLUSIVE: Watch the Trailer for Chinese ...
  • TIFF Thriller 'Cut Bank' Picked Up by ...
  • Screen Talk: Telluride Film Festival ...