"Hyde Park on Hudson," the second presidential portrait of the season, hits theaters today, starring Bill Murray as Franklin Delano Roosevelt. The film, which follows the 32nd president's hosting of Brit royals at his country estate and his affair with Margaret Suckley (Laura Linney), is generally too bland and insipid for the critics -- "terribly underwritten," "tacky" and "nothing tremendously effective."
Following after "The King's Speech," which also features King George VI, "Hyde Park" feels too flimsy to warrant feature film treatment and would have fared better on television. Murray is charming as FDR, but his sexual dalliances with two women other than his wife Eleanor (Olivia Williams) are handled in an icky male-gaze way by director Roger Michell, who is off his game on this one.
Mr. Michell has fun with the royal visit, and there’s an absorbing, intimate scene between the president and the king that could be a coda to “The King’s Speech,” the 2010 film about his relationship with his speech therapist. (You have to wonder if Daisy was added in a bid to better distinguish this movie from “The King’s Speech.”) Saddled with a role that groans with historical weight, yet is also terribly underwritten and underconceptualized, Mr. Murray’s Franklin rarely comes to palpable life before this encounter. The actor strikes familiar poses, the famous cigarette jauntily thrusting. Yet because the movie often assumes Daisy’s point of view (she also narrates), his character remains vague, remote, more of a place holder among the rest of the period-correct production design.
Though Daniel Day-Lewis as Abraham Lincoln is the presidential presentation of the moment, Bill Murray as Franklin Delano Roosevelt is well worth paying attention to. His FDR beautifully conveys the notion of the chief executive as seductive star performer, a man who counted on his ever-appealing charm to get his way in matters both personal and professional."
What we see is a combination of Bill Murray and FDR, which is a nice thing about the performance. It isn't mimicry, or the phenomenal transformation of Daniel Day-Lewis into Lincoln, but a more modest, impressionistic approach that's enjoyable on its own terms,..Unfortunately, the film's main concern isn't Anglo-American relations, but Roosevelt's relations, sexual and otherwise, with the women who surround him, and compete for his affection, or at least his attention.
"Half as long and twice as much fun as the self-important 'Lincoln,’' Roger Michell’s charming sex-and-politics comedy 'Hyde Park on Hudson’' is basically a frothy tabloid take on presidential history."
"And if you’re hoping to use this movie to cram for that upcoming history final on the New Deal or the Munich Pact, better downgrade those expectations right now. Hyde Park on Hudson has little more on its mind than hot dogs and hand jobs—which, come to think of it, would have made for a much catchier alliterative title."