Rotten Tomatoes is a more crowded, noisy, content-filled eclectic site for movie fans. RT is more likely to post a few critics early without waiting for the official review date. And their Cream of the Crop list is equivalent, really, to the Metacritic list. While some folks decry the debasement of film literature brought by Rotten Tomatoes (hello Don Murphy), I argue that exposing large numbers of film fans--who do use these sites to make their decisions about what to see--to more film critics is a good thing. (I try to link to both sites.)
OK. You tell me. Which do you prefer and why? And if you don't use them, who do you read to inform your movie choices?