You could blame George Clooney's back troubles on "U.N.C.L.E." not going forward with Soderbergh. (More details at The Playlist.) That started the series of delays and rumors of possible casting (I never bought Bradley Cooper and Soderbergh together). "Contagion" writer Scott Z. Burns, who has a chance at an original screenplay nomination in a weak year--for degree of difficulty alone--is bummed that "U.N.C.L.E." won't proceed. But when one door closes another opens. Warners may make it with another director. And it looks like Burns has several directing opportunities ahead.
And while Soderbergh had planned to lead his team into production at Warners, that doesn't mean they won't coalesce on something else. This weekend they are all sitting down at Soderbergh's house for a pow wow to look over their available options--about three possible scenarios going forward--to fit into the open March start date before shooting Matt Damon and Michael Douglas as Liberace in "Behind the Candelabra." Soderbergh does NOT want to do another foreign sales venture like "Che," though. Even if it's an indie, he wants North American distribution in place.
1 Comment
ag | November 20, 2011 2:56 PM
uncle should happen. being that it has strong franchise potential. it'll come together. soderbergh was probably not the best for this type product. neither, really, was clooney. cooper, maybe. but, agree, a cooper/soderbergh collaboration would have been...funny. however, a clooney/soderbergh take on this property would have been wrong...weird even. uncle ain't ocean's 11.
anyway, the people at warner knew all this. felt it. sat on their hands until the setup collapsed. i'm betting they're glad and hunting down a new team.
was not in the cards, as put together originally