Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

Spielberg, Tintin, and the Race for Oscar

Reviews
by Bill Desowitz
November 11, 2011 11:41 AM
7 Comments
  • |
Tintin v. Rango
Tintin v. Rango

If the animated Oscar competition comes down to originality and boldness, then you can't rule out a potential horse race between "Rango" and "The Adventures of Tintin." Make no mistake: despite the outcry from traditionalists, "Tintin" is nothing if not animated, and definitely a performance capture game-changer: a unique hybrid of the caricature and photoreal, thanks to the wizards of Weta, who've struck again after their "Rise of the Planet of the Apes" coup. The rendering of skin, eyes, mouth, and hair is so tactile, and there's a more believable sense of weight and movement.

But more than that, "Tintin" is such an exhilarating ride, thanks to a rejuvenated Steven Spielberg, who was like a giddy kid with his point and shoot virtual camera/game controller, inventing and refining as he went along in this rich, hyper-real, 3-D world.

From its inspired hand-drawn opening credit sequence (evoking not only the essence of Hergé but also the energy of Saul Bass), to its rousing cliff-hanger (passing the baton to Peter Jackson for the sequel),"Tintin" is the purest of pure cinema with its breathless action. I adore the fluid overlap of time and space and reality and memory; the way objects meld into one another like doppelgangers; the notion of seeing and being seen; and the way the past comes back to haunt you (such as the swashbuckling pirate flashbacks). Spielberg has truly found a kindred spirit in Hergé for merging his own classical sensibilities (riffing on Raiders, Hitchcock, and Bond) with the beloved Belgian's fantastical sense of wonder.

Take the opening. What a brilliant way of introducing Hergé's signature Ligne Claire graphic design and vivid color palette in the credits before entering the CG world of the movie. And having a Hergé stand-in painting a caricature of his Tintin creation, the earnest teenage reporter (Jamie Bell), is the perfect hand-off. It signals that we're entering a new dimension and takes care of any unfamiliarity with Hergé's comic books.

From there, it's an old-fashioned tale of goodness, innocence, danger, and redemption, which is where Hergé and Spielberg obviously meet on mutual ground. Of course, Tintin is merely a catalyst for finding Red Rackham's treasure ahead of the dastardly Sakharine (Daniel Craig). It's really about the drunken Captain Haddock (the always inventive Andy Serkis) and his appointment with destiny. And also the love between a boy and his dog. Speaking of which, Snowy, the faithful terrier, is a remarkable animated character, and the movie's unsung hero.

Indeed, Spielberg suggests it was Weta's successful animated test of Snowy that convinced him to go the performance capture route in the first place. And for those who doubt the wisdom of his choice, there's no way this would've worked as effectively as a live action/CG hybrid. The contrast would've been too stark. And Spielberg never could've pulled off the bravura motorcycle chase along the hilly Moroccan terrain -- all in one take.

But getting back to Oscar, there's certainly precedence on "Tintin"'s side. "Monster House" not only qualified but was nominated.

According to an Academy governor that I spoke with a year ago, the concern is that technology will make the craft of animation obsolete -- an automated pass through, so to speak. That's why they've added the "frame-by-frame" caveat in defining animation. But they're not even close to fully automating capture/render. Thus, performance capture merely gives you a more sophisticated framework from which to start, allowing the animators more time to bring it to life, frame-by-frame.

"You're still playing the truth of the character, whether it's rendered finally as a more animated visual style or photoreal," suggests Serkis. "If you're saying Tintin isn't animation, then what does that say about voice actors that come along and stand in a booth for a few hours and deliver lines? This was not the case: we shot it like a movie."

Or, as Disney's hand-drawn vet Eric Goldberg ("Winnie the Pooh") observes, "MoCap is a tool in the same way that rotoscope was a tool. It's how you use it. It's as little or as much as the filmmakers want. Hell, the Fleischers invented rotoscope, and you can't tell me that Koco the Clown or the dance in Snow White isn't animation. Of course it's animation!"

Let's see how "Tintin" (Dec. 21) plays with audiences and the Academy.
 

7 Comments

  • Scott | November 17, 2011 9:14 PMReply

    Tin Tin isn't animated. It's motion capture. Animation, by Academy Standards, is frame by frame creation of a performance--BY SCRATCH--by animators.

    And range was just awful. And didn't even make it's money back. BUTT ugly, too.

  • TheBoy | November 16, 2011 8:13 PMReply

    I live in London and I've seen Tintin in 3D and trust me it wasn't that good. The ratings on IMDb and Rotten tomatoes are high because its from Steven and Peter. Rango is much much better.

  • osdfh | November 16, 2011 6:37 PMReply

    how about a giving spoiler warning before reading this article? I didn't want to know about a key plot device, the cliff hanger, until I saw it. Thanks asshole!

  • TintinUSA | November 16, 2011 3:00 PMReply

    Wow, great article! I couldn't agree with you more. I can't wait to see how the movie does with American audiences. Being Belgian, I grew up with Tintin, ever since my dad taught me how to read in French at the age of 10, with the help of a Tintin book. I consider myself a hardcore Tintin fan and Spielberg's movie was everything I had hoped for ... and more! I had the honor to see the movie at the AFI Fest (it was the closing film of the festival) and was astonished by the number of references and homages to the other Tintin books. I mean, every single building, car, piece of art in the background, all were feature in at least one of the other Tintin adventures. Yes, Americans are not familiar with Tintin. Still, they will enjoy this movie for what it is: pure adventure! And to comment aon what Fairportfan said about the name being mispronounced throughout the film, the name was pronounced both ways: the English way by most characters in the movie and the original French way by some others, showing once again how much Spielberg respected Herge's work.

  • Fairportfan | November 16, 2011 12:04 PMReply

    By all reports it should appeal to USAian audiences who have no concept of the character, but it may not play so well among people who actually know and love the character.
    .
    I mean, they mispronounce the name throughout the film so that it sounds right for the USAian ear; this is like changing the title of the first Harry Potter book because poor ignorant USAians would have been confused by the original title.

  • Scott | November 13, 2012 9:45 PM

    In regard to Fairportfan's outrage at the mispronunciation of Tintin, he is 100% correct. For Spielberg to show such cultural insensitivity is unforgivable. For Irastev to argue that "It has made $47M in France, so obviously the (mis-)pronunciation of the names isn't that much of a problem..." is equally dumbfounding. In France, mate, it was dubbed into French with the correct pronunciation. No wonder no one was offended!

  • Irastev | November 17, 2011 3:27 AM

    It has made $47M in France, so obviously the (mis-)pronunciation of the names isn't that much of a problem...

Free Indie Movies and Documentaries    

Email Updates

Most "Liked"

  • Oscar Predicts Chart 2014Oscar Predictions 2015 UPDATE
  • First Gurus 'O Gold Pre-Festival Top ...
  • The Radical World of Avant-Garde Master ...
  • Participant Joins DreamWorks' Spielberg ...
  • Ben Kingsley's Tightrope with Mythology, ...
  • 'Birdman' Debuts at Venice to Rave Reviews: ...
  • Jake Gyllenhaal's 'Nightcrawler' Will ...
  • Sophia Loren to Receive Career-Honoring ...
  • Drafthouse and Participant Media Pick ...
  • Lake Bell Directs Again